What provides the centripetal force for the moon's orbit around Earth?​

nonmental

that should be the answer

Answer:

mę břöőda I dunno this answer

Explanation:

hope you find it

this is the correct answer

Answer:

Lotion - Semisolid

Suspension - Liquid

Capsule - Solid

(a) The tension on the wire when the two charges have opposite signs is 383.5 N.

(b) The tension on the wire if both charges were negative is 3.640.25 N.

The given parameters;

(a)

The attractive force between the charges is calculated as follows;

[tex]F_1 = \frac{kq_1q_2}{r^2} \\\\F_1 = \frac{(9\times 10^9) \times (8.75\times 10^{-6})\times (-6.5\times 10^{-6})}{(0.025)^2} \\\\F_1 = -819 \ N[/tex]

The force on the negative charge due to the electric field is calculated as follows;

[tex]F_2 = Eq_2\\\\F_2 = (1.85 \times 10^8) \times (6.5 \times 10^{-6})\\\\F_2 = 1202.5 \ N[/tex]

The tension on the wire is the resultant of the two forces and it is calculated as follows;

[tex]T = F_2 + F_1\\\\T = 1202.5 - 819\\\\T = 383.5 \ N[/tex]

(b) when the two charges are negative

The repulsive force between the two charges is calculated as follows;

[tex]F_1 = \frac{kq_1q_2}{r^2} \\\\F_1 = \frac{(9\times 10^9) \times (-8.75\times 10^{-6})\times (-6.5\times 10^{-6})}{(0.025)^2} \\\\F_1 = 819 \ N[/tex]

The force on the first negative charge due to the electric field is calculated as follows;

[tex]F_2 = Eq_1\\\\F_2 = (1.85 \times 10^8)\times (8.75 \times 10^{-6})\\\\F_2 = 1618.75 \ N[/tex]

The force on the second negative charge due to the electric field is calculated as follows;

[tex]F_3 = Eq_2\\\\F_3 = (1.85 \times 10^8) \times (6.5 \times 10^{-6})\\\\F_3 = 1202.5 \ N[/tex]

The tension on the wire is the resultant of the three forces and it is calculated as follows;

[tex]T= F_1 + F_2 + F_3\\\\T= 819 + 1618.75 + 1202.5\\\\T = 3,640.25 \ N[/tex]

Learn more here:https://brainly.com/question/19565286

Answer:

Explanation:

d) The Moon moved so that the student astronomer was able to see less of the half that faced the sun.

An Excerpt from “Optimism”

by Helen Keller

1 Could we choose our environment, and were desire in human undertakings synonymous with

endowment, all men would, I suppose, be optimists. Certainly most of us regard happiness as

the proper end of all earthly enterprise. The will to be happy animates alike the philosopher, the

prince and the chimney-sweep. No matter how dull, or how mean, or how wise a man is, he feels

that happiness is his indisputable right.

2 It is curious to observe what different ideals of happiness people cherish, and in what singular

places they look for this well-spring of their life. Many look for it in the hoarding of riches, some

in the pride of power, and others in the achievements of art and literature; a few seek it in the

exploration of their own minds, or in the search for knowledge.

3 Most people measure their happiness in terms of physical pleasure and material possession.

Could they win some visible goal which they have set on the horizon, how happy they would be!

Lacking this gift or that circumstance, they would be miserable. If happiness is to be so

measured, I who cannot hear or see have every reason to sit in a corner with folded hands and

weep. If I am happy in spite of my deprivations, if my happiness is so deep that it is a faith, so

thoughtful that it becomes a philosophy of life,—if, in short, I am an optimist, my testimony to

the creed of optimism is worth hearing....

4 Once I knew the depth where no hope was, and darkness lay on the face of all things. Then

love came and set my soul free. Once I knew only darkness and stillness. Now I know hope and

joy. Once I fretted and beat myself against the wall that shut me in. Now I rejoice in the

consciousness that I can think, act and attain heaven. My life was without past or future; death,

the pessimist would say, “a consummation devoutly to be wished.” But a little word from the

fingers of another fell into my hand that clutched at emptiness, and my heart leaped to the

rapture of living. Night fled before the day of thought, and love and joy and hope came up in a

passion of obedience to knowledge. Can anyone who has escaped such captivity, who has felt

the thrill and glory of freedom, be a pessimist?

5 My early experience was thus a leap from bad to good. If I tried, I could not check the

momentum of my first leap out of the dark; to move breast forward is a habit learned suddenly

at that first moment of release and rush into the light. With the first word I used intelligently, I

learned to live, to think, to hope. Darkness cannot shut me in again. I have had a glimpse of the

shore, and can now live by the hope of reaching it.

6 So my optimism is no mild and unreasoning satisfaction. A poet once said I must be happy

because I did not see the bare, cold present, but lived in a beautiful dream. I do live in a

beautiful dream; but that dream is the actual, the present,—not cold, but warm; not bare, but

furnished with a thousand blessings. The very evil which the poet supposed would be a cruel

6) Read the last sentence from the text.

Only by contact with evil could I have learned to feel by contrast the beauty of truth and love and goodness.

Explain how Helen Keller develops this idea in the text. Use specific details to

support your answer.

Answer:

gass fire and the same density

Explanation:

Answer:

climate of that area

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Use kinematic equation v² = u² + 2as

Rearrange for distance

s = (v² - u²) / 2a

Realize that at the top of its flight, the ball has zero velocity and gravity is acting downward in an assumed upward positive reference frame.

s = (0² - 29²) / (2(-9.8))

s = 42.90816...

s = 43 m

In order to calculate frictional force look below..

The formula given by

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto F_f=\mu N[/tex]

Or

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto F_f=\mu mg[/tex]

u is coefficient of friction

N is normal reaction.

Given what we know, we can confirm that option D,  Electromagnetic waves with high frequency are more energetic than electromagnetic waves with low frequency is true.

High-frequency waves are synonymous with short wavelengths. This means that the waves are oscillating much quicker and therefore carry more kinetic energy within them. This is transformed and released as electromagnetic radiation, which is the reason why high-frequency waves are more energetic than low-frequency electromagnetic waves.

Therefore, we can confirm that the statement "Electromagnetic waves with high frequency are more energetic than electromagnetic waves with low frequency" is true.

To learn more about electromagnetic waves visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3101711?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ1

Answer:

Một vật được ném xiên lên từ đỉnh của một tòa nhà cao 20m với góc 600 so với phương ngang, tốc độ ban đầu là 10m/s. Xác định độ cao cực đại của vật so với mặt đất?

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

006

They are acting in opposite directions. Therefore the net force is found by subtraction. The sign is the same as the larger number.

Net Force = 99.6 - 52.8 = 46.8 N acting in the same direction as the 99.6  which is upward.

008

If the two forces act in the same direction, the net force is found by addition.

Net Force = 99.6 + 52.8  = 152.4 N downward.

Answer:

for part A the answer is D and for part B the answer is F

We have that for the Question "Light of 650 nm wavelength illuminates two slits that are 0.20 mm  apart. (Figure 1) shows the intensity pattern seen on a screen behind the slits.

What is the distance to the screen?" it can be said that  the distance to the screen

d=1.168m

From the question we are told

Light of 650 nm wavelength illuminates two slits that are 0.20 mm

apart. (Figure 1) shows the intensity pattern seen on a screen behind the slits.

What is the distance to the screen?

Generally the equation for the distance  is mathematically given as

[tex]d=\frac{0.33*10^{-2}*0.23*10^{-3}}{650*10^{-9}}\\\\d=1.160m[/tex]

d=1.168m

Therefore

The distance to the screen

d=1.168m

For more information on this visit

https://brainly.com/question/23379286

Answer:

198 meters

Explanation:

I'm not sure but hope it helps

Answer:

Light traveling through a vacuum moves at exactly 299,792,458 meters (983,571,056 feet) per second. That's about 186,282 miles per second

Explanation:

Answer:

this

Explanation:

because of this its this ok

Answer: They are named for the places where geologists first described rocks or fossils from that time.

Explanation: ingenuity

As we know,

F= ma

Here,

applied force(f)= mass × acceleration

=80kg×3m/s2

=240kgm/s2

=240N

Answer:

What is instillation

Explanation:

Answer:

Correct answer is letter E.Ca

Answer:

?

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:yy

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Answer:

Lotion : semisolid

Suspension : liquid

capsule : solid

Explanation:

Newton's second law allows us to find the results for the acceleration of the blocks are:

1) The acceleration is a = 559 m / s²

2) The acceleration is a = 7.88 m / s²

Newton's second law states that the net force is equal to the product of the mass and the acceleration of the body.

       ∑ F = m a

Where the bold letters indicate vectors, F is the force, m the mass and the acceleration of the body.

The reference system is a coordinate system with respect to which the decomposition of the forces is carried out, in the attached we have a free body diagram of the system.

1) They indicate that the body mass is 25 kg.

y-axis

       N - W = 0

       N = W = m g

x-axis

        F -fr = ma

The friction force is a macroscopic force that results from the sum of all the microscopic interactions between the two surfaces, it has the formula

        fr = μ N

Where fr is the friction force, N the normal and very the friction coefficient.

This friction coefficient has two values:

We substitute.

         F - μ m g = m a

a) The system moves which is the acceleration.

Suppose that the force that star to move the system keeps constant, just before the system begins to move the coefficient of friction is static, let's find the applied force.

         F = μ m g

         F = 0.73 25 9.8

         F = 178.85 N

The block begins to move and the friction coefficient decreases to the dynamic value, we look for the acceleration.

         a = [tex]\frac{F - \mu \ m g}{m}[/tex]  

         a = [tex]\frac{178.85 - 0.16 \ 25 \ 9.8 }{25}[/tex]  

         a = 5.59 m / s²

2) In this case the mass of the block is 79 kg and the applied force is

        F = 909 N

We look for acceleration.        

        a = [tex]\frac{909 - 0.37 \ 79 \ 9.8 }{79}[/tex]  

        a = 7.88 m / S²

In conclusion using Newton's second law we can find the results for the acceleration of the blocks are:

         1) The acceleration is a = 559 m / s²

         2) The acceleration is a = 7.88 m / s²

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/11329269

Answer:

335 - 30 g

Explanation:

V = Vo + g*T = 335

Vo + 9.8*30 = 335

Vo =

From your previous question

Mass=30kg

Acceleration=12m/s^2

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto F=ma[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto F=30(12)[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto F=360N[/tex]

Given,

Acceleration = 12 m/s²

According to your previous question you posted,

Mass = 30 KG

Solution:

We know that the formula of force according to the Newton's second law is:

[tex]\longmapsto \sf \red{f = m \times a}[/tex]

[tex]\sf \longmapsto \ 30 \times 12[/tex]

[tex]\sf \longmapsto \: \boxed {\sf \blue3 \red60}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\sf \boxed{ \bf \: force = 360\: N}[/tex]

Answer:

configuration of string:

Node - Antinode - Node    or N-A-N

This is 1/2 wavelength since a full wavelength is N-A-N-A-N

f (fundamental) = V / wavelength

F0 = 300 m/s / 1 m = 100 / sec

F1 = 300 m/s / .5 m = 600 / sec

Each increase is a multiple of the fundamental since the wavelength

increases by 1/2 wavelength to keep nodes at both ends of the string