Answer:
An act that is performed only by a human being and thus is proper to man. When a human being does such acts, they are called acts of man but not human acts. ... Acts of man, therefore, are acts shared in common by man and other animals, whereas human acts are proper to human beings.
Explanation:
Please mark as brainliest
how you can acquire the professional standards for teacher?
Explanation:
ewan ko basta ang alam ko wala kang jowa
when may a minor legally purchase alcohol in texas
Answer:
Texas alcohol laws permit adults aged 18 or older to tend bar. They may also serve alcohol in a venue for drinking on-site. Those 16 or older may sell beer and wine in stores selling it for consumption elsewhere. They must be age 21 to sell spirits (liquor) in such businesses.
Explanation:
im not sure a minor can. pretty sure its illegal.
WHY DO PEOPLE POST RANDOM AND DISTURBING QUESTIONS?
Answer:
could i have an example?
Explanation:
What decides if a ruling is the law of the land?
Answer:
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws
Explanation:
Answer:The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.
Identify the woman in the picture.
6. Why did the Supreme Court accept Gideon's Case?
The Court held that the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Why has probation become so important to the operation of law enforcement?
It is the most commonly applied sanction.
It is the most underused sanction.
It has become a sadly ineffective sanction.
It is the sanction preferred by judges.
Answer: A. It's the most conmanly applied sanction
Explanation:
"Probation plays an extremely important role in the operation of the law enforcement and corrections systems in the United States. Probation is currently the most commonly applied correctional sanction," - from the article the very first paragraph in the page off Edge.
7. What was the Supreme Court ruling in Gideon?
Answer:
In 1963, The supreme court unanimously in favor of the Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts
12. Which best describes a unitary government?
a. A single person holds unlimited political power.
b. The power to rule is held by a small group.
c. The government usually gains power by force.
d. All powers held by the government belong to a central agency
Answer:
the answer is D.
Explanation:
The correct option is D. All powers held by the government belong to a central agency best describe a unitary government.
A centralized government is a common term used to denote a unitary administration. A single, centralized agency is the owner of all government authority. For its convenience, the central government establishes local units of governance.
Why is unitary government important?The fact that the duties and powers of the government are frequently pretty distinct is one of the main benefits of a unitary system. In times of emergency, a clear division of authority frequently yields quicker responses and help than a system of governance where power is shared across numerous government agencies.
In a unitary state, the central authority is paramount and holds all governmental authority. There is only one central legislature that passes laws for the entire nation, and the central government has absolute power.
A country that is split up into numerous areas, each of which has its own set of powers but is still under the control of the federal government.
Thus, The response that best describes a unitary government that is given in option D is right. It states that all powers held by the government belong to a single central agency.
Learn more about Unitary Government here:
https://brainly.com/question/19528787
#SPJ6
What was the original purpose of profiling?
Informal criminal profiling has a long history. It was used as early as the 1880s, when two physicians, George Phillips and Thomas Bond, used crime scene clues to make predictions about British serial murderer Jack the Ripper's personality.
John Douglas in the year 1970 started the original profiling purpose for the FBI. Hence, the above statement is correct.
What is the Original Profiling Purpose?The original profiling purpose was John Douglas's watershed theory about criminalizing the fact and the idea regarding FBI promotions. The FBI used his technique to capture the criminals. The main purpose is the way in which criminal psychology has been taken into consideration.
The Original Profiling Purpose was described as the result of the primary purpose of the FBI's motive for the criminal activity.
Learn more about the Original Profiling Purpose here:
https://brainly.com/question/14343968
#SPJ2
Why do the people do what they do in verse 31?
create a blank Levels/Branches grid (4 rows x 3 columnst label the levels and
branches on the outside of the box and find a news headline on the internet that
contains the appropriate term Place entire head ine in correct box and label that
box with correct term ("Congress", "Sheriff, etc)
Criminal charges made against an accused person and put in writing prior to their being put on trial, is called what?
Answer:
Indictment.
Explanation:
An employees personal email composed and sent at work is protected by the right of privacy true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Employees' right to privacy in the workplace encompass an employee's personal information and activities at work. ( That include private emails)
8.
What was the vote on the ruling?
A casting vote is a vote that someone may exercise to resolve a deadlock. A casting vote is typically by the presiding officer of a council, legislative body, committee, etc., and may only be exercised to break a deadlock.
Examples of officers who hold casting votes are the Speaker of the British House of Commons and the President of the United States Senate (an ex-officio role of the Vice President of the United States).
In some legislatures, a casting vote may be exercised however the presiding officer wishes. An example is the Vice President of the United States, who may exercise his casting vote in the Senate according to his party affiliation or according to his own personal beliefs; by virtue of the Vice President's casting vote, when the Senate as elected is equally divided between two parties, the Vice President's party is able to serve as the official majority party in the Senate.
In some other legislatures, by contrast, a casting vote can only be exercised according to strict rules or conventions. For example, the Speaker of the British House of Commons (and analogous positions in most Westminster Parliaments) is expected by constitutional convention to follow Speaker Denison's rule, i.e. to vote to allow further discussion, if this is possible, and otherwise to vote in favour of the status quo.
In the United States, the concept of a casting vote is not used in Robert's Rules of Order.
Regarding age and gender related to violent crime victimization, choose the most accurate statement:
* a. Young males are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* b. Young females are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* c. Older males are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* d. Older females are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
Encoding and Decoding are in a constant cycle in a good speech, this means that the speaker is sending a message and the audience is receiving it and sending feedback in return.
True or False
9. What ultimately happened to Clarence Earl Gideon?
Answer:
Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. ... After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court
here were we stand we shall have two winners of the daily give away so play your cards right my friends for u shall never see this today again
oh and please give me all of the food in ur fridge right now
ayoooooooo cool cool
You are interviewed by a prospective employer concerning a job that you have coveted for several years. After protracted (lengthy) negotiations, you are presented with a pre-printed form contract that contains the terms of your employment agreement.
In the body of the agreement, it states, “This document contains the full and complete understanding and agreement by and between the parties. No other representations or promises have been made. Both parties understand that this contract is a wholly integrated agreement.” This language appeared somewhere in the middle of the 4 page pre-printed form.
Just prior to signing the agreement, the employer made several promises to you, including but not limited to the following:
You will receive a year-end bonus each and every year that will be based on your performance
Your health insurance will be paid by the company after you complete your probationary period of six months
You will be reimbursed for auto expenses that you incur while using your car for business purposes.
The employer refused to honor ANY of the above oral promises and also fired you without cause. You sue the employer and attempt to introduce evidence of the oral promises. Your employer objects.
What are the legal arguments favoring your employer that if accepted by the court, would prevent you from introducing evidence of the promises?
What are the legal arguments that you would make to convince the court to allow you to introduce the oral promises?
Answer:
The legal argument favoring the employer it is his decision to employ u if he wants.
The legal that you would make to convince the court is the agreement paper u bring it to the court has sign of evidence of the promises or agreement. it might be able to covince them to believe u.
Plz don't report me
in john 10 who are the sheep
Answer:
In this case, He contrasts His spiritual leadership with that of false teachers, including the hypocritical religious critics of His own era. Jesus previously identified Himself as "the Good Shepherd," saying that He was willing to die for the sake of His flock. This is a very different approach from a typical "hired" shepherd, who is inclined to run when there is danger. Spiritually, Jesus is the ultimate example of a shepherd willing to sacrifice Himself for the safety and health of His flock.
In the prior verse, Jesus echoed an important point made in His first analogy (John 10:1–6). There He referred to the way sheep instinctively learn to recognize the voice of their own shepherd. This reflects the close, knowing, personal relationship a "good shepherd" has with the sheep. Here, Jesus compares that closeness and intimacy with the relationship between God the Son and God the Father. This echoes other statements in the New Testament which imply that salvation through Jesus Christ brings us into an intimate family relationship with God (1 John 3:1; Romans 8:16–17).
Drag each tile to the correct box.
what is the Sequence in forensic history events in chronological order.
Answer:
We need to see the tiles
Explanation:
If not we dont know what it looks like or how to help you
Answer:
pic
Explanation:
i cant answer without a pic
4. How did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
Answer:
Florida law only permitted counsel of poor defendants charged with capital offenses. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition was denied.
Explanation:
Gideon v. Wainright
Supreme Court ruled that the 6th amendment's guarantee of counsel corresponds with the 14th amendment (made obligatory) by the states. In other words, the 6th amendment guarantees the defendant the right to the assistance of counsel in ALL criminal proceedings. Finally, the states had to provide counsel.
PLEASE HELP !!! With any question !!!
1: what evidence let the police to arrest Clarence Gideon ?
2: at the beginning of the trial why did Gideon not have a lawyer ?
3: how did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
4: how did Gideon‘s case get to the Supreme Court ?
5: why did the Supreme Court a sept Gideon‘s case ?
6: what was the supreme court ruling and Gideons?
7: what was the vote on the ruling
8: what ultimately happened to Clarence earl Garden?
Answer:
1.Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested after a nearby resident told police he had see Gideon walking away from the pool hall about 5:30 AM. When police arrested Mr. Gideon, he had a pint of wine and a pocketful of change.
Explanation:
As a future student, why we need so study special crime investigation?
How is formal authority distinguished and give examples of each characteristic from the SAA case
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached and you did not include the SSA case, we can only comment on formal authority.
When we use the term formal authority, we mean that is the kind of power that a company gives to a leader in a corporation. For example, when a new manager is hired by a company, he is granted the power to lead the company or any of its departments. At this moment, the manager has the power and influence over its employees.
However, there is another concept called informal authority, that does not come from the owners of the company or the high hierarchy. It comes from your employees, the people. It is the moment when people trust who you are and follow you for what you have shown, not for your position in the company.
That is why it is so important to have both kinds of authority because it is the best way to lead people under difficult circumstances.
Compaq Ltd has a net income after tax of $2 000 000 for the year ended 30 June 2018. At the beginning of the period Compaq Ltd has 900 000 fully paid-up ordinary shares on issue. On 1 January 2018 Compaq Ltd had issued a further 300 000 fully paid-up ordinary shares at an issue price of $2.00. On 1 March 2018 Compaq Ltd made a one-for-five bonus issue of ordinary shares out of retained earnings. The last sale price of an ordinary share before the bonus issue was $2.50. At the beginning of the current period Compaq Ltd also had 500 000, $1.00, 5% cumulative preference shares on issue. The dividends on the preference shares are not treated as expenses in the statement of comprehensive income. The basic earnings per share for the period ended 30 June 2017 was $1.50 per share. Required: a) Calculate the basic
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Here are the questions:
a. Calculate the basic EPS amount for 2018.
b. Explain what is diluted EPS. Give one example of a security that can dilute the basic EPS.
First, we need to calculate the weighted average number of equity shares. This will be:
= (900,000 × 12/12) + (300,000 × 12/12) + (240,000 × 10/12)
= 900,000 + 300,000 + 200,000
= 1,400,000
We then calculate the earnings for equity shares. This will be:
Net income = 2,000,000
Less: Dividend on preference shares
= 500,000 × 5% = 25,000
Earnings for equity share = 1,975,000
EPS = 1,975,000/1,400,000
= 1.41
b. Diluted earnings per share (diluted EPS) is used to calculate the earning per share for a company's in a situation whereby there's a conversion of all the convertible securities.
An example of a security that can dilute the basic earnings per share is the preference shares which have been converted.
4. You have just turned 18 in time to vote in the upcoming election. You have studied at length the policies of both candidates running for office and your own values and priorities don’t align with either campaign. Would you go ahead and select one of the candidates or make the decision to not vote in this particular election? Explain the rationality behind your choice.
You have just turned 18 in time to vote in the upcoming election. I would you to go ahead and select one of the candidates. The right to vote is one of the most significant liberties enjoyed by citizens of the United States.
Why is it important to have a fair election?Elections offer a crucial chance to advance democracy and promote political liberalization. Certain civil liberties, like the freedoms of speech, association, and assembly, are necessary for an election to be free and fair. Suffrage, or the ability to vote, is a crucial component of our democracy.
Voting is a process that a group, such as an electorate or meeting, can use to reach a consensus or express an opinion, typically after discussions, debates, or election campaigns. Voting is how democracies choose their leaders for high office.
Learn more about Voting here:
https://brainly.com/question/29573892
#SPJ2
What is difference between warrant of arrest and warrantless arrest?
Answer:
the difference is a warrant arrest is when law enforcement plans your arrest and a warrantless arrest is when it just happens like getting a traffic stop and them finding unexpected drugs.
Explanation:
There are many differences between a warrant arrest and the non-warrant arrest. The major difference between both the arrests is that while arresting a person with a warrant the law authorities were already prepared to arrest that with documents and permission of the court.
However, in a non-warrant arrest, the arrest is made without any preparation either for petty crimes or for such crimes which are dangerous for society but took place suddenly without the notice of the law authorities.
What is an arrest?The Arrest is made by the law authorities in order to regulate the law and order in the regions and also to protect the civilians from the crimes which can take place by the criminals.
The act of arrest doesn't declare a person a criminal but it begins the process of reaching the criminal by arresting the accused person.
Learn more about “arrest” here:
https://brainly.com/question/14286068
#SPJ2
Debates must utilize all three purposes for public speaking: to inform, to entertain, and to persuade.
True or False
Answer: true
Explanation: good luck
