1) What was the Yazoo Land Act?





2) Why did the Act become a Scandal?





3) Why were the legislators in the picture burning the law after it had already been repealed?





4) What did that message send to the public?

Answer:

cons

once you have signed it you can change it back

pros

its in writing and if the person at the other side of the signing changes there mind they cant change the statements

so sorry if this didnt help or i read it wrong

Answer:

first law

Explanation:

Answer:

C. He was starting for wwII

Explanation:

Rizal was a genius in his era because he had a unique philosophy that changed people beliefs toward the Spanish colony

Answer: Defining characteristics of the parliamentary system are the supremacy of the legislative branch within the three functions of government—executive, legislative, and judicial—and blurring or merging of the executive and legislative functions.

Explanation:

All up there! Reply if you have anymore questions!

The dominance of the legislative branch among the three branches of government executive, legislative.

The term government refers that the system which was governed by a state or a country in it, we see there are different governments are being there in states the government is made by the people and govern for the people also in it. There is a system being made and under the system, the government is being run.

As judicial as well as the blending or blurring of the executive and legislative functions are what define the parliamentary system.

Therefore, By the statement. ( A parliament combines the legislative and judicial branches of a country ) is true.

Learn more about the government here:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ2

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Citizens from the north and south would vote to decide if a territory or state would become free or slave

A popular sovereignty is a type of government that runs on the will and consent of the people, meaning it is directed by the people, who make all decisions of the government.

Hope this Helps! Please Mark Brainliest!

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

sorry po ,i dont know the answer

Answer:

However, some face a unique set of challenges in society as a result of their religious beliefs. Some may experience discrimination or internal conflict because of their beliefs.

Answer:

George Washingmachine

Explanation:

i took the quiz :/

The leader that do not promote the new nationalism of the "American System" was George Washington. Thus, option forth is correct.

Nationalism is a philosophy that prioritizes allegiance, loyalty, or patriotism to a nation or nation-state over other person or group concerns.

The American System was an economic strategy introduced in the first part of the nineteenth century which was based on Alexander Hamilton's "American School" concepts that played a significant role in American politics throughout the America.

The plan was to unify the nation, which was supported by various leaders such as Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay etc.

George Washington was the leader who did not support the new nationalism of the "American System." Therefore, it can be concluded that  option forth is correct.

Learn more bout nationalism here:

https://brainly.com/question/1018147

#SPJ2

Answer:  

New Hampshire

Rhode Island  

Connecticut

Massachusetts

Explanation:

New Hampshire for trading and fishing

Rhode Island for people of all religions

Connecticut for farming, trading, and political freedom

Massachusetts for escaping the religious persecution in England

Answer:

Massachusetts Escape religious persecution in England

Connecticut Farming, trade, political freedom

Rhode Island Colony for people of all religions

New Hampshire Trade, fishing

New York Colony built on land captured from Dutch

Pennsylvania Quaker colony

Delaware Trade, farming

Virginia English Colony in North America, Search for gold

Maryland Colony for Catholics

New Jersey Colony built on land captured from Dutch

North Carolina Farming

South Carolina Farming

Georgia Colony for debtors

Explanation:

Answer:-The term gilded age refers to the corruption in government in the period 1870-1900

-The term gilded age refers to the unequal distribution of wealth in the period 1870-1900

Explanation:

The correct options are C, and D. These two statements about the Gilded Age are accurate

The phrase "Gilded Age" was first used by Mark Twain and Charles Dudley Warner in their 1873 book The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today as an ironic comment on the contrast between the real golden age and the present time, a time of booming prosperity in the United States that gave rise to a class of the super-rich.

Thus, Between the Civil War and World War I, there was a period known as the "Gilded Age," in which the population and economy of the United States rapidly expanded, there was a great degree of governmental corruption and corporate financial misdeeds, and many affluent people led opulent lifestyles.

Learn more about Civil War here:

https://brainly.com/question/11874600

#SPJ2

Answer:

Invasions by Barbarian tribes

The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.

Explanation:

here is your answer hope you will enjoy and mark me as brainlist

thank you

Answer:

You have been directed to trim $10,000 from the monthly warehouse

told that you cannot reduce the costs for HVAC, refrigeration, and ligh

expense must be cut significantly?

A. Water

B. Copiers

C. Computers

D. Lights

The costs for HVAC, refrigeration, and ligh expense must be cut significantly in computers. Hence, option C is correct.

Cost reduction is the procedure of lowering a business's expenses in order to increase profits. It entails locating and eliminating expenses that don't benefit customers in any way, as well as streamlining operations to increase productivity. Cost-cutting efforts frequently concentrate on producing quick financial gains.

Cost cutting is essential to a company's long-term survival and profitability. A business can boost profits by cutting costs, which it can then deploy in other business ventures or utilize to lower prices and boost its competitiveness.

Closing facilities, streamlining the supply chain, downsizing to a smaller office or moving to a less expensive building or region, lowering or eliminating outside professional services, such as advertising agencies and contractors, are just a few examples of cost-cutting techniques that can be used.

Thus, option C is correct.

For more information about cost reduction, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30295647

#SPJ7

Answer:

1: Divine right of kings, in European history, a political doctrine in defense of monarchical absolutism, which asserted that kings derived their authority from God and could not therefore be held accountable for their actions by any earthly authority such as a parliament.

Answer:

Progressive Era

Purification to eliminate waste and corruption was a powerful element as well as the progressives' support of worker compensation, improved child labor laws, minimum wage legislation, a limited workweek, graduated income tax and allowed women the right to vote. :)

Explanation:

Answer:

During the 70 years of the Soviet era, women's roles were complex. Women in Soviet Russia became a vital part of the mobilization into the work force, and this opening of women into sectors that were previously unattainable allowed opportunities for education, personal development, and training.

Answer:

tools i think

Explanation:

Answer:

The Players or coach HAS to clean up the field if it gets trashed after the game

Explanation:

A B, and D dont sound right but C so it would be "has"

The distinguishing factor between Philis Wheatley's and Abigail Adam's letters from the rhetoric of Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and Thomas Paine is the humility in their tone.

They were praying, begging, and imploring men to match their words with their actions.  They urged freedom fighters to remember those who suffered neglect in the fight for freedom. For example, Wheatley used an occasion of her personal letter to Rev. Occum to point out "the contradiction between the colonists' demands for freedom from Britain and the colonists' determination to uphold black slavery" in their backyards.

Abigail Adams also urged her husband, John Adams, that the American male politicians then clamoring for freedom should not forget the freedom deserved by women. In her reasoning, America cannot claim victory over British oppression when the men were not ready to extend the same rights to their wives, mothers, and sisters, and by implication, the slaves.

The rhetoric of Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, and Thomas Jefferson showed that they were only interested in gaining freedom for the white men. They also showed that women had low regard. Women during those years were homemakers with only bedroom voices.

Thus, the personal letters of Philis Wheatley and Abigail Adams show the low place accorded women by American Founding Fathers.  There was no single Founding Mother among the crowd!

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/2008415 and  https://brainly.com/question/3347124

Answer:

The Creel Committee

Explanation:

 to influence public opinion favorably toward American participation in World War I, President Woodrow Wilson established the Committee on Public Information (CPI) through Executive Order 2594 on April 13, 1917.

Answer:

Good was eventually hanged and Osborne never confessed nor did she accuse any person of being a witch. She died in jail before she was ever brought to trial.

Explanation:

I remember reading about that in a history book my dad made me read

Answer:

1. Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.

2. Right to keep and bear arms in order to maintain a well regulated militia.

3. No quartering of soldiers.

4. Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.

5. Right to due process of law, freedom from self-incrimination, double jeopardy.

6. Rights of accused persons, e.g., right to a speedy and public trial.

7. Right of trial by jury in civil cases.

8. Freedom from excessive bail, cruel and unusual punishments.

9. Other rights of the people.

10. Powers reserved to the states.

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is a it make more scenes

It’s Election Day in the United States, and as the day unfolds, all eyes will be on the men and women streaming into the polls to cast their ballots. News broadcasts will be devoted to counting up all the votes cast, and trying to divine who came out to vote and why.But American elections aren’t actually about the people who vote. They’re about the people who don’t. Politicians are almost always chosen by less than a majority of the population. Laws and practices that exclude large numbers of potential voters determine who wins and who loses.That’s by design. Voter exclusion is hard-wired into what is, on close inspection, a very undemocratic system of governance. The U.S. Constitution placed the selection of presidents in the hands of “electors,” not the people, and it offered no clear protections for a citizen’s right to vote. In the original Constitution, states retained enormous latitude to determine who went to the polls and who did not.And although amendments eventually extended voter protection to black Americans, women and people 18 and over, even these guarantees were only partially enforced. Communities nationwide used poll taxes, literacy tests, inconvenient voting locations and onerous registration requirements to discourage voting by particular groups, especially African Americans and other minorities.The real fraud in American voting is not illegally cast votes but legally blocked ones. Our history has taught us all too well how to keep people away from the polls, despite their constitutional rights. Even a half-century after the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, tens of thousands of citizens are denied the franchise because of insufficient proof of identity, felony convictions or other state stipulations — all of which are designed today, as they were in the past, to keep certain people from casting their ballots.“Certain people” means, most obviously, people of color, who are told they are not welcome as voters at every stage in the process, from demeaning rhetoric about their “fake” votes to convoluted registration processes to intimidation at the polls. For many Mexican Americans, it feels safer just to stay home. That’s why states such as Texas have electorates that remain dominated by white votes even as their populations become rapidly more diverse.But “certain people” also means those without access to wealth. The mobilization of money for elected office makes dominant groups even more powerful. The sheer scale of wealth in the hands of several billionaires has allowed them, and their political action committees (PACs), to smother competitors. As the rich have become so much richer, they have made their votes count more, and the votes of others count less. Donald Trump began his presidential campaign as a critic of big political donors, but he and his supporters in the Republican Party benefited from their money in the election.By the time poor citizens vote, the candidates have already been vetted by the wealthy donors who are necessary for any person running to have a chance. That means Election Day is really about choosing among candidates handpicked by the super wealthy (say, Trump or Hillary Clinton), rather than candidates who reflect the needs and experiences of citizens.And this dominance by wealth becomes more true with each successive electoral cycle. As candidates require more and more money for advertising and social media, the influence of money grows. Parties have always chosen elites, but now fundraising crowds out other qualities of leadership. You cannot run if you cannot bring in big bucks, immediately.Gerrymandering likewise nullifies votes, erecting exclusionary boundaries between voters and their representatives. During the decennial district-drawing process for national, state and local representatives, the politicians in power choose their voters, rather than the other way around. Incumbent legislators make certain that their districts are dominated by like-minded citizens, and they limit the power of opposition groups by splitting their presence among as many districts as possible.Although gerrymandering goes back to the earliest days of the republic, it has never distorted electoral outcomes as much as it does today. Wisconsin and Texas are two of many states where elected representatives are far more Republican than the voters. That is because Republican majorities in both legislatures set it up that way, exaggerating and entrenching their power with the lines they drew across the landscape. New computer technologies have turned this process into a precise science, limiting voter choice wherever possible.These structural roadblocks make clear how little say citizens have in who represents them. The system is indeed “rigged,” but the rigging benefits the powerful, the wealthy and the extremes — not the vast majority of Americans.Trump’s presidency is a result of this system.  

Answer: C. The manipulation of time and sequence of events….

Explanation:

I just did it.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

i hope it helps......not a sure person

The power to interpret laws is one of the examples of a check that congress has over the other branches of the government. Therefore option D is correct.

Congress is the body that enacts ruling as the legislative branch. The U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives make up Congress. Each state has two U.S. Senators and at least one U.S. Representative.

The Constitution gives Congress, one of the three similar branches of the state, a number of significant functions. The only unit of the government with the authority to pass new laws or amend existing ones is Congress, which has complete legislative control.

There are 435 voting members of the House of Representatives and 100 senators (two from each state) that make up the current Congress. Each organization is directly affected by the terms of office and membership.

Hence, The power to interpret laws is one of the examples of a check that congress has over the other branches of the government.

To learn more about Congress follow the link.

https://brainly.com/question/4736734

#SPJ5

Answer:

Since the late 1930s, conventional wisdom has held that President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal” helped bring about the end of the Great Depression. The series of social and government spending programs did get millions of Americans back to work on hundreds of public projects across the country.

But in the 80 years since the Great Depression was formally declared over in June of 1938, historians and economists have continued to debate the true merits of the New Deal and whether, in fact, the radical government spending programs brought about the end of the biggest economic downturn in history.

Explanation:

Explanation:

In general, House rules and practices allow a numerical majority to process legislation relatively quickly. Senate rules and procedures, on the other hand, favor deliberation over quick action, as they provide significant procedural leverage to individual Senators.

Answer:

the house has more complex debate rule then the senate

Explanation:

the house place more restrictions on debate times and the Senate according to the legislative procedures of the House of Representative and no longer face filibuster's . (the right to unlimited debate ) was used until 1842, when a permit room imitating the duration of debate was created