1. A Rhode Island couple and their three-year-old son move into a new custom-built
house near the shore. Shortly afterward, they notice fungus and mold growing on the
house's woodwork, which they attribute to the humid ocean air. They clean the mold
whenever they see it growing, but it consistently returns. One year later, the couple's
son develops a serious neurological disorder. Doctors determine that the disorder
was the result of mold exposure. A house inspection determines that the mold
originated with the lumber used to build the house, which was improperly stored
before being used to build the house.
a. Gather the facts related to this case and determine the issue involved. (1 point)
|
Answer: 1. before they had moved in they should have checked everywear in the house for this specific reason. 2. the couple should have gotten the mold professionally removed or resolved ( replaced the wood or use some prevention chemicals).
Explanation:
if they had done these things the child would have most likely been fine i also dont know how this relates with "law"
The principle of
was established in the court case Marbury v Madison
O Judicial Activism
O Judicial Restraint
O Judicial Review
O Judicial jurisdiction
Answer:
The answer is Judicial Review
does texas bill allows for death penalty for women who get abortions?
in addition to fines and being required to appear in court, what penalty can be imposed on service technicians who violate clean air act provisions?
The penalty of revoking the Service technician work license is part of what can be imposed on violation of the Act.
The Clean Air Act is a federal law which provides regulation on air emissions from stationary and mobile sources in an attemp to reduce and control air pollution.
The Service technicians are the experts who diagnose problems and makes repairs of these object which emits air.
If the service technicians violates the Clean Air Act provisions, the penalty which can be imposed on him includes:
FinesRequired to appear in courtRevoke of licence.Learn more about Clean Air Act here
brainly.com/question/2375762
What was the court case Brown vs Bourd of Education about?
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.
The Intellectual property rights are considered a part of which important aspect in the United States? What does the Government need to do with the IPR laws on a regular basis? In the United States, intellectual property rights such as copyright laws are part of the . The government needs to constantly adapt and IPR and related laws.
Answer:
Berne Convention
Revise
Explanation:
Socratic
Answer:
Answer:
Berne Convention
Revise
Explanation:
a state’s lieutenant governor is similar to which position at the federal level?
Answer:
vice president
Explanation:
A state’s lieutenant governor is similar to vice president position at the federal level
Who is a state’s lieutenant governor?State’s lieutenant governor is the state government official of U.S. He/she is the officer of state after the governor. In case of any vacation in the office of the governor, the lieutenant governor takes in charge
The lieutenant governor is the presiding officer of the state legislature's upper house and is similar to the position of vice president of the U.S.
Therefore, a state’s lieutenant governor is similar to a vice president position at the federal level.
Learn more about state’s lieutenant governor here:
https://brainly.com/question/1428839
what is different about the system for collecting taxes under the articles of confederation as compared to the constitution?
Answer:
Under the Articles of Confederation, The government could not collect taxes or draft soldiers; under the Constitution, both are allowed
What is the level of punishment for criminal attempt?
Answer:
An attempt is generally punished as one-half the sentence of the completed crime.
how many jury members are there in a criminal trial
Answer:
twelve people,
Explanation:
Twelve people, and alternates, make up a criminal jury. A unanimous decision must be reached before a defendant is found “guilty.” The government must prove the crime was committed “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Answer:
There are 12 juror members in a criminal trial.
Explanation:
I am certain this is right by the way.
The rule of law, which asserts that all must abide by the laws of a nation, has its basis in _______.
A. Tort
B. Penal Code
C. Magna Carta
D. Code of Hammurabi
Answer:
The answer is Penal Code.
Answer:
jej3hh4hhwiiwbebhzygfbthduh
Explanation:
ueurgrg5vv5jshfhtbbdhhhdhbfhhfhhfhruijjnkjnuhxfhn 4th y xd 4tbh
if a person charged with treason denies his guilt, how many persons must testify against him before he can be convicted?
(10 points)
Imagine you are a defense attorney hired to represent Ms. Guilty Thief. Read this police report from the case file and then write an argument asking the judge to exclude certain evidence in her case. Your argument should consist of 1 paragraph identifying the evidence that should be excluded and explaining your reasons why. (Hint: Think about what cases you learned about in 2.01 and 2.02).
Answer:
im looking for answer illl cmment
Explanation:
major scandals at enron, worldcom, and tyco led to the passage of which law in 2002?
Answer:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,response to financial scandals in the early 2000s involving publicly traded companies
Explanation:
Does a strict liability case necessarily include an ultrahazardous activity?
O A. Yes, because ultrahazardous activities are strict liability claims.
O B. Yes, because strict liability is based on fault.
O C. No, because it may include a defective product.
D. No, because an ultrahazardous activity is a negligence action.
Answer:
A i think
Explanation:
"Under the original Common Law, strict liability was applied if an action was “ultra-hazardous” An activity was deemed “ultra-hazardous” if it necessarily involved a risk of serious harm to the person, land or property of another person that could not be eliminated by the exercise of even the utmost care."
on lawself.com
C. No, because it may include a defective product.
What is the difference between a mental deficiency and a mental disease? How are
mental deficiencies related to crime? (Hint: what type of crime is highly associated with a
mental deficiency?)
Answer: Mental illness refers to a condition that affects a persons thinking and feelings, mental deficiency has to do with cognitive ability. Mental Illnesses can be treated and eventually go away while mental deficiencies are life-long conditions that can only be improved.
Explanation:
in what way has the executive article fueled debate on presidential power?
Answer:
It contains vague wording, leaving much room for interpretation.
Explanation:
what law enables citizens to obtain information from the government about a subject of interest when a written request is made?
Answer:
FOIA
Explanation:
Since 1967, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) has provided the public the right to request access to records from any federal agency. It is often described as the law that keeps citizens in the know about their government.
what makes american law enforcement differ from law enforcement agencies around the world
Answer:
U.S Law enforcement has the
largest history of police brutality for any modern country in the world. In addition, the U.S law enforcement offices have more militarized equipment than most other countries. Lastly, the education required to become a cop in the United States. Most only require a high school diploma, while a lot of other countries require some degree that pertains to law or emergency management.
Explanation:
congressional subpoena compliance and enforcement act
Answer:
act of 2019
Explanation:
This bill establishes certain rules that apply in a civil action by the Senate, House of Representatives, or a congressional committee or subcommittee against an individual who receives, but fails to comply with, a congressional subpoena.
Additionally, the bill establishes requirements for the recipient of a subpoena from a congressional committee or subcommittee.
Who’s good at law and stuff? If u are can you pls help me with my assignment! Help ya girl out
Answer:
yes i can help u
Explanation:
because i said;)
Explain 2 ways that gravity can be limited
___ goodman, longtime judge on dancing with the stars
Answer:
Who is Leonard Gordon Goodman
Explanation:
What is the most commonly used insanity defense?
A young person is in a public area, and an adult in a car calls out for help. What should the young person do?
Answer:
Have his phone ready to dial 911
Explanation:
criminal law recognizes that a defendant may not be responsible for a criminal act if his mental state was impaired by
PLEASE HELP! Fill in the following areas to display your knowledge of the framework of the Constitution. You are practicing your writing skills so be sure to thoroughly explain each of the frameworks with specific examples from our governmental system.
Popular Control but NOT Majority Rule
Explanation
Example
Three Coordinate Branches of Government
Explanation
Example
Power LImited & Checks and Balances
Explanation
Example
Federalism as a basis
Explanation
Example
Answer:
Mark me as brainlist
Explanation:
Three Coordinate Branches of Government
Explanation
Example
Power LImited & Checks and Balances
Explanation
Example
Federalism as a basis
Where does a parking enforcement officer typically put a parking ticket on your car?
A: Taped across the license plate
B: Tucked under the windshield wiper
C: Crammed into a cup holder
D: Rolled up in the tailpipe
Answer: B.
Explanation: Tucked under the windshield wiper
in a diversity case, federal trial courts are required to apply a _______ when considering a motion for a new trial based on the excessiveness of the verdict.
Answer:
State law standard.
In a diversity case, federal trial courts are required to apply a state law standard when considering a motion for a new trial based on the excessiveness of the verdict.
I hope this helped at all.generally, how many supreme court justices have to agree to review a case from the us courts of appeals?
Answer:
Four out of Nine need to agree
