NEED HELP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer:

18972 I use an calculator

The solution of number 527 × 36 after multiplying is,

⇒ 527 × 36 = 18,972

We have to give that,

To solve the expression,

⇒ 527 × 36

Now, simplify the numbers as,

⇒ 527 × 36

After multiply,

⇒ 18,972

So, the solution is,

⇒ 18,972

Learn more about the multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10873737

#SPJ6

Answer:

257890 is the function of the equation

Step-by-step explanation:

mark me BRAINLIEST

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9 × 9 = 81

This is basic 12x12 tables math

Answer:

81

Step-by-step explanation:

you just take 9 and times it by 8 and you get 81

Step-by-step explanation:

1. use PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponent, Multiplication & Division, Addition & Subtraction). you would do 3/4 divided by 3/8 first.

  3/4 / 3/8 = 2  

2. add 2 to -2 1/2 (or if it's easier to understand, do 2 minus 2 1/2)

  -2 1/2 + 2 = -1/2     OR       2- 2 1/2 = -1/2

answer is -1/2

Answer:

it's A

Step-by-step explanation:

2x - 1

I put b and got it wrong

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation: pick up the phone baby i know your home

Answer:

the answer would be an equation

x+2

Step-by-step explanation:

x+2

If x = –2 is a zero, then x + 2 = 0, so x + 2 is a factor. Similarly, if x = 1/3 is a zero, then x – 1/3 = 0, so x – 1/3 is a factor. By giving me two of the zeroes, they have also given me two factors: x + 2 and x – 1/3.

Answer

7 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

$490 - $175 = $315

John needs $315 still for the camera

divdie $315 by $50 and you get 6.3 but because it cant be 6 weeks he would be short $15 you would have to wait an additional week in order to cover the cost of the camera completly.

Brainliest please!!!!

Answer:

(a) and (b) are not true in general. Refer to the explanations below for counterexamples.

It can be shown that (c) is indeed true.

Step-by-step explanation:

This explanation will use a lot of empty sets [tex]\phi[/tex] just to keep the counterexamples simple.

Note that [tex]A \cap B[/tex] can well be smaller than [tex]A[/tex]. It should be alarming that the question is claiming [tex]A\![/tex] to be a subset of something that can be smaller than [tex]\! A[/tex]. Here's a counterexample that dramatize this observation:

Consider:

The intersection of an empty set with another set should still be an empty set:

[tex]A \cap B = \left\lbrace 1\right\rbrace \cap \left\lbrace\right\rbrace = \left\lbrace\right\rbrace[/tex].

The union of two empty sets should also be an empty set:

[tex]((A \cap B) \cup C) = \left\lbrace\right\rbrace \cup \left\lbrace\right\rbrace = \left\lbrace\right\rbrace[/tex].

Apparently, the one-element set [tex]A = \left\lbrace 1 \right\rbrace[/tex] isn't a subset of an empty set. [tex]A \not \subseteq ((A\cap B) \cup C)[/tex]. Contradiction.

Consider the same counterexample

Left-hand side:

[tex](A \cup B) \cap C = \left(\left\lbrace 1 \right\rbrace \cup \left\lbrace \right\rbrace\right) \cap \left\lbrace 2 \right\rbrace\right = \left\lbrace 1 \right\rbrace \cap \left\lbrace 2 \right\rbrace = \left\lbrace \right\rbrace[/tex].

Right-hand side:

[tex](A \cap B) \cup C = \left(\left\lbrace 1 \right\rbrace \cap \left\lbrace \right\rbrace\right) \cup \left\lbrace 2 \right\rbrace\right = \left\lbrace \right\rbrace \cup \left\lbrace 2 \right\rbrace = \left\lbrace 2 \right\rbrace[/tex].

Apparently, the empty set on the left-hand side [tex]\left\lbrace \right\rbrace[/tex] is not the same as the [tex]\left\lbrace 2 \right\rbrace[/tex] on the right-hand side. Contradiction.

Part one: show that left-hand side is a subset of the right-hand side.

Let [tex]x[/tex] be a member of the set on the left-hand side.

[tex]x \in (A \backslash B) \cap C[/tex].

[tex]\implies x\in A \backslash B[/tex] and [tex]x \in C[/tex] (the right arrow here reads "implies".)

[tex]\implies x \in A[/tex] and [tex]x \not\in B[/tex] and [tex]x \in C[/tex].

[tex]\implies (x \in A\cap C)[/tex] and [tex]x \not\in B \cap C[/tex].

[tex]\implies x \in (A \cap C) \backslash (B \cap C)[/tex].

Note that [tex]x \in (A \backslash B) \cap C[/tex] (set on the left-hand side) implies that [tex]x \in (A \cap C) \backslash (B \cap C)[/tex] (set on the right-hand side.)

Therefore:

[tex](A \backslash B) \cap C \subseteq (A \cap C) \backslash (B \cap C)[/tex].

Part two: show that the right-hand side is a subset of the left-hand side. This part is slightly more involved than the first part.

Let [tex]x[/tex] be a member of the set on the right-hand side.

[tex]x \in (A \cap C) \backslash (B \cap C)[/tex].

[tex]\implies x \in A \cap C[/tex] and [tex]x \not\in B \cap C[/tex].

Note that [tex]x \not\in B \cap C[/tex] is equivalent to:

However, [tex]x \in A \cap C[/tex] implies that [tex]x \in A[/tex] AND [tex]x \in C[/tex].

The fact that [tex]x \in C[/tex] means that the only possibility that [tex]x \not\in B \cap C[/tex] is [tex]x \not \in B[/tex].

To reiterate: if [tex]x \not \in C[/tex], then the assumption that [tex]x \in A \cap C[/tex] would not be true any more. Therefore, the only possibility is that [tex]x \not \in B[/tex].

Therefore, [tex]x \in (A \backslash B)\cap C[/tex].

In other words, [tex]x \in (A \cap C) \backslash (B \cap C) \implies x \in (A \backslash B)\cap C[/tex].

[tex](A \cap C) \backslash (B \cap C) \subseteq (A \backslash B)\cap C[/tex].

Combine these two parts to obtain: [tex](A \backslash B) \cap C = (A \cap C) \backslash (B \cap C)[/tex].

Answer:

Answer A makes the most sense by far.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer A makes the most sense by far.   However, strictly speaking, the coefficient of x^2 does not have to be positive if we're using the quadratic formula.  Using some other approach, such as factoring, obtaining a positive coefficient for x^2 is helpful.

Answer:

16.825 is the answer for your question

Answer:

4.543 billion years i think, i apologize if im wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4.54 billion years

Step-by-step explanation:

Scientists use the layers of rock of the Earth's crust/core to estimate how old is the earth.

Answer:

A,B,C,D

Step-by-step explanation:

They are all the same equation on both sides of the equal sign and sense the variable is x on all of them whatever number you put on one side you have to put it on the other side therefore resulting in any solution you could think of.

Answer:

i think it is -1/2

Answer:

[tex] -\dfrac{13}{18} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] -\dfrac{8}{9} - (-\dfrac{1}{6}) = [/tex]

[tex] = -\dfrac{8}{9} + \dfrac{1}{6} [/tex]

[tex] = -\dfrac{16}{18} + \dfrac{3}{18} [/tex]

[tex] = -\dfrac{13}{18} [/tex]

Answer: X and Y

Step-by-step explanation: IF I REMEMBER dont get mad if you don’t get it right

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3(3z-6)=0

multiply your three with the 3z and the -6

9z-18=0

figure out what - 18 = 0

9z=18

9*2=18

z=2

hope this helps

Answer: it would be 2 to the right and 2 up

Step-by-step explanation:

2 right 2 up

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If each input value leads to only one output value, classify the relationship as a function. If any input value leads to two or more outputs, do not classify the relationship as a function.

Answer:

Letter B is yes because if you use the vertical line test, never anytime the vertical line intersect the graph in more than one point.

Answer:

0.25

Step-by-step explanation:

scale factor=md/od

=0.5/2

0.25

Answer:

Multiply 5 by 4.22 because 5 cups of water is 4.22 liters

Answer:

Did you mean [tex]\frac{-2x}{9} ?\\[/tex]

Please clarify so that I can work this problem out for you :)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=9/2x -13/2

Step-by-step explanation:

i used a calculator i hope its right