Answer:
Gideon sought relief from his conviction by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. In his petition, Gideon challenged his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial judge's refusal to appoint counsel violated Gideon's constitutional rights.
Explanation:
plz mark me as a brainiestWhich of the following events from World War II is an extreme illustration of the Principal-Agent Problem?
O The invasion of Pearl Harbor
The loss of the U.S.S. Indianapolis
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan
O The Nazi establishment of concentration camps
Hitler's leadership of the Third Reich's war effort
Answer:
Hitler's leadership of the Third Reich's war effort.
Explanation:
By definition, a party (agent) agrees to work in favor of another (principle) in return for some incentive.
What are social causes
Answer: Some examples of social causes include:
Fighting poverty.
Preventing bullying.
Civil Rights Advocacy.
LGBTQ+ advocacy.
Fighting for or against immigration.
Raising money for life-saving medical research.
Helping the homeless, etc.
Explanation:
Why is it so difficult to respond to terrorism
Answer:
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government or its citizens to further certain political or social objectives. Law enforcement generally recognizes two types of terrorism: domestic and international.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court Case New Jersey v. TLO questioned the rights students had in public schools. TLO was a New Jersey high school student whose locker was searched after school officials had reason to believe she was distributing drugs and cigarettes. She was found guilty and sentenced to a one-year probation. TLO appealed the decision all the way to the Supreme Court, which initially decided that her 4th Amendment rights (which protect a person’s home, belongings and body from being searched without just cause) had been violated. However, upon re-arguing the case, “the Court held that while the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable warrantless searches of students under their authority notwithstanding the probable cause standard that would normally apply to searches under the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the search of T.L.O.'s purse was reasonable under the circumstances”.
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s final decision or their initial? Why or why not? In your answer, discuss the Fourth Amendment, how it applies to this case, and which verdict you agree with (the initial or final verdict).
Answer:
its c
Explanation:
Are executive orders ever unconstitutional?
Answer:
The legal or constitutional basis for executive orders has multiple sources. ... Like both legislative statutes and regulations promulgated by government agencies, executive orders are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if the orders lack support by statute or the Constitution.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education overturned which long-standing public policy?
O
the policy that allowed for segregated schools and other public services, as long as the services and buildings serving black patrons were
equal to those serving white patrons
O the policy that public education should be provided at no cost
O the policy that allowed black students to attend school
O the policy that allowed history textbooks to remove any reference to the Civil War and slavery
© 2016 Glynlyon, Inc.
< PREVIOUS
NEXT
SAVE
SUBMIT
2016 Glynlyon, Inc. All rights reserved
V6.0.3-0038 20200504 mainline
US 1:1
What is the difference between offer and invitation to treat?
An offer is made when a person shows a willingness to enter into a legally binding contract. An invitation to treat (I.T.T) is merely a supply of information to tempt a person into making an offer.
8.
What was the vote on the ruling?
A casting vote is a vote that someone may exercise to resolve a deadlock. A casting vote is typically by the presiding officer of a council, legislative body, committee, etc., and may only be exercised to break a deadlock.
Examples of officers who hold casting votes are the Speaker of the British House of Commons and the President of the United States Senate (an ex-officio role of the Vice President of the United States).
In some legislatures, a casting vote may be exercised however the presiding officer wishes. An example is the Vice President of the United States, who may exercise his casting vote in the Senate according to his party affiliation or according to his own personal beliefs; by virtue of the Vice President's casting vote, when the Senate as elected is equally divided between two parties, the Vice President's party is able to serve as the official majority party in the Senate.
In some other legislatures, by contrast, a casting vote can only be exercised according to strict rules or conventions. For example, the Speaker of the British House of Commons (and analogous positions in most Westminster Parliaments) is expected by constitutional convention to follow Speaker Denison's rule, i.e. to vote to allow further discussion, if this is possible, and otherwise to vote in favour of the status quo.
In the United States, the concept of a casting vote is not used in Robert's Rules of Order.
2. In order for a person to be charged with criminal liability, that person must be guilty of two elements.
Drag each tile to the correct box.
what is the Sequence in forensic history events in chronological order.
Answer:
We need to see the tiles
Explanation:
If not we dont know what it looks like or how to help you
Answer:
pic
Explanation:
i cant answer without a pic
PLEASE HELP !!! With any question !!!
1: what evidence let the police to arrest Clarence Gideon ?
2: at the beginning of the trial why did Gideon not have a lawyer ?
3: how did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
4: how did Gideon‘s case get to the Supreme Court ?
5: why did the Supreme Court a sept Gideon‘s case ?
6: what was the supreme court ruling and Gideons?
7: what was the vote on the ruling
8: what ultimately happened to Clarence earl Garden?
Answer:
1.Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested after a nearby resident told police he had see Gideon walking away from the pool hall about 5:30 AM. When police arrested Mr. Gideon, he had a pint of wine and a pocketful of change.
Explanation:
As a future student, why we need so study special crime investigation?
Criminal charges made against an accused person and put in writing prior to their being put on trial, is called what?
Answer:
Indictment.
Explanation:
how you can acquire the professional standards for teacher?
Explanation:
ewan ko basta ang alam ko wala kang jowa
Even after the ratification of the 15th amendment, African Americans were denied the right to vote in the south because the amendment was not implemented.
(a) What does that tell you about American attitudes from 1870 until the 1950s?
(b) Why did the attitudes change?
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Why has probation become so important to the operation of law enforcement?
It is the most commonly applied sanction.
It is the most underused sanction.
It has become a sadly ineffective sanction.
It is the sanction preferred by judges.
Answer: A. It's the most conmanly applied sanction
Explanation:
"Probation plays an extremely important role in the operation of the law enforcement and corrections systems in the United States. Probation is currently the most commonly applied correctional sanction," - from the article the very first paragraph in the page off Edge.
create a blank Levels/Branches grid (4 rows x 3 columnst label the levels and
branches on the outside of the box and find a news headline on the internet that
contains the appropriate term Place entire head ine in correct box and label that
box with correct term ("Congress", "Sheriff, etc)
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Answer:
B
Explanation:
An energy transformation flow diagram is shown.
A flow diagram beginning with an X. An arrow goes from the X to a toaster oven. Another arrow goes from the toaster oven to the words Thermal Energy.
What type of energy does X most likely represent?
X = radiant energy
X = chemical energy
X = gravitational energy
X = electrical energy
Answer:
chemical
Explanation:
explain the difference of offer and invitation to treat.
Encoding and Decoding are in a constant cycle in a good speech, this means that the speaker is sending a message and the audience is receiving it and sending feedback in return.
True or False
12. Which best describes a unitary government?
a. A single person holds unlimited political power.
b. The power to rule is held by a small group.
c. The government usually gains power by force.
d. All powers held by the government belong to a central agency
Answer:
the answer is D.
Explanation:
The correct option is D. All powers held by the government belong to a central agency best describe a unitary government.
A centralized government is a common term used to denote a unitary administration. A single, centralized agency is the owner of all government authority. For its convenience, the central government establishes local units of governance.
Why is unitary government important?The fact that the duties and powers of the government are frequently pretty distinct is one of the main benefits of a unitary system. In times of emergency, a clear division of authority frequently yields quicker responses and help than a system of governance where power is shared across numerous government agencies.
In a unitary state, the central authority is paramount and holds all governmental authority. There is only one central legislature that passes laws for the entire nation, and the central government has absolute power.
A country that is split up into numerous areas, each of which has its own set of powers but is still under the control of the federal government.
Thus, The response that best describes a unitary government that is given in option D is right. It states that all powers held by the government belong to a single central agency.
Learn more about Unitary Government here:
https://brainly.com/question/19528787
#SPJ6
You are interviewed by a prospective employer concerning a job that you have coveted for several years. After protracted (lengthy) negotiations, you are presented with a pre-printed form contract that contains the terms of your employment agreement.
In the body of the agreement, it states, “This document contains the full and complete understanding and agreement by and between the parties. No other representations or promises have been made. Both parties understand that this contract is a wholly integrated agreement.” This language appeared somewhere in the middle of the 4 page pre-printed form.
Just prior to signing the agreement, the employer made several promises to you, including but not limited to the following:
You will receive a year-end bonus each and every year that will be based on your performance
Your health insurance will be paid by the company after you complete your probationary period of six months
You will be reimbursed for auto expenses that you incur while using your car for business purposes.
The employer refused to honor ANY of the above oral promises and also fired you without cause. You sue the employer and attempt to introduce evidence of the oral promises. Your employer objects.
What are the legal arguments favoring your employer that if accepted by the court, would prevent you from introducing evidence of the promises?
What are the legal arguments that you would make to convince the court to allow you to introduce the oral promises?
Answer:
The legal argument favoring the employer it is his decision to employ u if he wants.
The legal that you would make to convince the court is the agreement paper u bring it to the court has sign of evidence of the promises or agreement. it might be able to covince them to believe u.
Plz don't report me
4. You have just turned 18 in time to vote in the upcoming election. You have studied at length the policies of both candidates running for office and your own values and priorities don’t align with either campaign. Would you go ahead and select one of the candidates or make the decision to not vote in this particular election? Explain the rationality behind your choice.
You have just turned 18 in time to vote in the upcoming election. I would you to go ahead and select one of the candidates. The right to vote is one of the most significant liberties enjoyed by citizens of the United States.
Why is it important to have a fair election?Elections offer a crucial chance to advance democracy and promote political liberalization. Certain civil liberties, like the freedoms of speech, association, and assembly, are necessary for an election to be free and fair. Suffrage, or the ability to vote, is a crucial component of our democracy.
Voting is a process that a group, such as an electorate or meeting, can use to reach a consensus or express an opinion, typically after discussions, debates, or election campaigns. Voting is how democracies choose their leaders for high office.
Learn more about Voting here:
https://brainly.com/question/29573892
#SPJ2
As an estimation we are told £3 is €4. Convert £15 to euros
Answer:
20
Explanation:
Based on the estimation of £3 to €4, then £15 to euros will be 20 euros.
This is because if £3 is equal to €4 the to get the amount of euro, we would divide the £15 by £3, then multiply by €4.
Therefore, in this case, £15 divided by £3 gives £5.
That means we will have multiples of 5 of €4 in the conversion we are looking for.
Hence, the multiple of 5 of €4 gives us €20 or 20 Euros.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer or conversion of euro we would get is 20 Euros.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24896081
What decides if a ruling is the law of the land?
Answer:
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws
Explanation:
Answer:The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.
Compaq Ltd has a net income after tax of $2 000 000 for the year ended 30 June 2018. At the beginning of the period Compaq Ltd has 900 000 fully paid-up ordinary shares on issue. On 1 January 2018 Compaq Ltd had issued a further 300 000 fully paid-up ordinary shares at an issue price of $2.00. On 1 March 2018 Compaq Ltd made a one-for-five bonus issue of ordinary shares out of retained earnings. The last sale price of an ordinary share before the bonus issue was $2.50. At the beginning of the current period Compaq Ltd also had 500 000, $1.00, 5% cumulative preference shares on issue. The dividends on the preference shares are not treated as expenses in the statement of comprehensive income. The basic earnings per share for the period ended 30 June 2017 was $1.50 per share. Required: a) Calculate the basic
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Here are the questions:
a. Calculate the basic EPS amount for 2018.
b. Explain what is diluted EPS. Give one example of a security that can dilute the basic EPS.
First, we need to calculate the weighted average number of equity shares. This will be:
= (900,000 × 12/12) + (300,000 × 12/12) + (240,000 × 10/12)
= 900,000 + 300,000 + 200,000
= 1,400,000
We then calculate the earnings for equity shares. This will be:
Net income = 2,000,000
Less: Dividend on preference shares
= 500,000 × 5% = 25,000
Earnings for equity share = 1,975,000
EPS = 1,975,000/1,400,000
= 1.41
b. Diluted earnings per share (diluted EPS) is used to calculate the earning per share for a company's in a situation whereby there's a conversion of all the convertible securities.
An example of a security that can dilute the basic earnings per share is the preference shares which have been converted.
WHY DO PEOPLE POST RANDOM AND DISTURBING QUESTIONS?
Answer:
could i have an example?
Explanation:
How is formal authority distinguished and give examples of each characteristic from the SAA case
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached and you did not include the SSA case, we can only comment on formal authority.
When we use the term formal authority, we mean that is the kind of power that a company gives to a leader in a corporation. For example, when a new manager is hired by a company, he is granted the power to lead the company or any of its departments. At this moment, the manager has the power and influence over its employees.
However, there is another concept called informal authority, that does not come from the owners of the company or the high hierarchy. It comes from your employees, the people. It is the moment when people trust who you are and follow you for what you have shown, not for your position in the company.
That is why it is so important to have both kinds of authority because it is the best way to lead people under difficult circumstances.
4. How did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
Answer:
Florida law only permitted counsel of poor defendants charged with capital offenses. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition was denied.
Explanation:
Gideon v. Wainright
Supreme Court ruled that the 6th amendment's guarantee of counsel corresponds with the 14th amendment (made obligatory) by the states. In other words, the 6th amendment guarantees the defendant the right to the assistance of counsel in ALL criminal proceedings. Finally, the states had to provide counsel.
