Answer:
safety net
Explanation:
1. Police Officer Rector observed an automobile going the wrong direction on a one-way street. When the officer tried to stop the automobile, the driver fled, resulting in a high-speed chase. The chase ended when the driver’s car crashed into a telephone pole. Concerned that the car might ignite from a gas leak, the officer pulled the unconscious woman from the car. As he was grabbing the woman from the car, he saw he a knife covered in blood on the front seat. After pulling the woman to safety the officer went back to the vehicle and recovered the knife. It was later discovered that the knife was used in a murder of the woman’s husband. Did Officer Rector legally find the knife? Explain.
This branch has the power to appoint judges and give pardons.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answer:
Executive
Explanation:
On page 406 of the text, read the case entitled Coker v. Pershad. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey reasons that AAA had no control over the independent contractor's work and thus Pershad was an employee of Five Star, but Five Star (and by extension, Pershad) were independent contractors to AAA. This type of arrangement is not uncommon. Neither are situations where trucking companies (among others) employ individuals who are designated as independent contractors but are trained by the company and have a manual of regulations provided to them which, in essence, controls where they drive, how they drive, how long are the drivers' work breaks, and who can ride in the cab of the truck. Additionally, drivers often wear a company uniform. The artifice of calling someone an independent contractor when the driver actually is not, is no more than an effort to avoid liability for the person's actions on the job and certain regulatory (unemployment insurance; workers compensation, etc.) and tax considerations. Consequently, the situations must be carefully examined on a case-by-case basis to discern the actual status of the individual. Do you agree with the courts reasoning? Why?
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question.
Explanation:
Yeah, We agree with the North Carolina Court the decision that 5 Stars was an independent consultant. AAA does hire and fir five Stars staff, who may not evaluate all staff to see if their company is fit. they will not. AAA employed 5 Star in the name of the rental agency and was not responsible for its and other businesses. It is an employer, that is a consultant regardless of who determines to work. Decided to hire that work or even the independent contractor the company that had hired an independent contractor. We employ people as they already have the training to do a work, which the organization has completed, this is like recruiting an employment agency. I don't think companies avoid liability.
How do Supreme Court decisions on the First and Second Amendments and the relationship of those amendments to the Fourteenth Amendment reflect a commitment to individual liberties
Answer:
The supreme law of the United States of America is the Constitution of America. The 1st and the 2nd amendment to the Constitution provided right to freedom and equality to all. It provided liberty to the people.
Explanation:
1. The application and the interpretation of the 1st amendment and the free exercise clauses to reflect an ongoing majoritarian practice of religion and the free exercise. This was during the case of Wisconsin v. Yoder
2. Efforts to balance the social order as well as the freedom of the individual are reflected by the interpretation of the 1st amendment which limits speech and includes place, manner regulation, time, defamatory, offensive statement, etc.
3. U.S. Supreme Court has held symbolic speech o be protected by the 1st amendment.
4. According to the 2nd amendment, the decision of the Supreme court rests upon the constitutional interpretation of the individual liberty.
When an officer uses the phrase “Juliet-Alpha-Mike-Echo-Sierra” to call in the last name of a suspect, he or she is using which type of police communication? A. 10-code B. Law enforcement jargon C. Plain language communication D. Phonetic alphabet scheme
Answer:
D. Phonetic alphabet scheme
Explanation:
Juliet- Alpha- Mike- Echo- Sierra is JAMES
This branch has the power to declare laws unconstitutional.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answer:
judicial Branch
Explanation:
Can someone write two paragraphs about forensics science today???
Answer:
Here ya go hope this works for u ;)
Forensic scientists use analytical and scientific techniques to examine evidence from crimes and prepare legal statements that summarise the results for court cases. Forensic science is the application of science to the law by gathering and examining evidence to be used in a legal case.
During the forensic science process, forensic equipment is used to process samples and evidence to solve crimes. ... Specifically, sciences such as biology, chemistry and mathematics are combined with various technologies to process evidence.
Answer:
Forensic science R&D in the 1980s laid the groundwork for advances in the 1990s and early 2000s that had a profound impact on crime laboratories. Although the scientific advances, particularly the growth of DNA testing, provided more effective tools for analyzing evidence and identifying perpetrators, they also led to a dramatic increase in the demand for lab services. By the late 1990s and through the 2000s, demand outstripped the ability of the labs to respond quickly and efficiently. Today, scientists and technicians at forensic labs are under relentless pressure to produce results faster and at lower cost. NIJ employs a two-pronged approach to supporting forensic labs:
• In the short term, NIJ awards grants to labs that cover the increasing costs of processing cases, assist in DNA backlog reduction and support ongoing efforts to adopt more advanced instrumentation and analytical methods.
• In the long term, NIJ awards grants to scientists to conduct research, both basic and applied, that can lead to methods, techniques and technology that will advance forensic science and, ultimately, public safety and justice.
Innovation is an essential way to assist crime labs. For example, high-tech robotic workstations can now process large numbers of DNA samples simultaneously, allowing crime labs to work more efficiently. NIJ-supported research helped in the development of fully automated systems that amplify DNA from small samples to determine a person’s genetic profile. The workstations not only make labs more efficient but also lower the cost of DNA processing.
NIJ is also funding several projects that seek to apply more sophisticated methods to detect and analyze evidence. Examining evidence for trace amounts of blood or other biological material is time consuming for law enforcement and crime lab personnel, and it requires techniques that can compromise or destroy evidence. One NIJ-funded project involves developing a camera with multispectral and fluorescence imaging capabilities to detect and identify fingerprints, body fluids, stains and other residues at crime scenes. Such imaging technology would make it easier for investigators to find and process evidence while minimizing evidence contamination.
Researchers working on another NIJ-supported project are developing methods that will allow investigators to identify the body fluids in a stain without destroying any of the stained material. Researchers are also exploring how to use one sample to determine multiple pieces of information, such as body fluid type and genetic information associated with identity.
Explanation:
how can you tell if something has a balanced or unbalanced force acting on it
Answer:
To determine if the forces acting upon an object are balanced or unbalanced, an analysis must first be conducted to determine what forces are acting upon the object and in what direction. If two individual forces are of equal magnitude and opposite direction, then the forces are said to be balanced.
Explanation:
Stay frosty!
Answer:
If it is balanced, the object stays still. If it is unbalanced, the object is in motion.
What was the important issue decided in the 1824 case of
Gibbons v. Ogden?
ce for e
O A. Whether or not employers have to provide health
insurance for employees
O B. What levels of courts would be included in the
federal court system
O C. What to do with a business that monopolizes an
industry
O D. Which government entity is empowered to regulates
interstate commerce
Answer:D
Explanation:
Ethics has to do with what my feelings tell me is right or wrong?
Answer:::: True.
Explain your answer:
This branch has the President and Cabinet departments
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answer:
The Executive Branch
Explanation:
Executive Branch of the U.S. Government. The executive branch carries out and enforces laws. It includes the president, vice president, the Cabinet, executive departments, independent agencies, and other boards, commissions, and committees.
Answer:
Executive branch.....
why is severing on a jury important?
Answer:
Explanation:
Jurors perform a vital role in the American system of justice. ... Jury service is a high duty of citizenship. Jurors aid in the maintenance of law and order and uphold justice among their fellow citizens. Their greatest reward is the knowledge that they have discharged this duty faithfully, honorably, and well.
Miranda rights must be advised only when a person is in custody.
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Miranda applies only to custodial interrogations, which means the police don't have to give Miranda warnings every time they question or talk to someone. Miranda rights come into play when the police arrest or detain someone. Detention here means that the person reasonably believes he or she is not free to leave.
Your car must have two red taillights mounted on the rear visible from ______ feet
Tatiana is looking to purchase a BMW that costs $30,000. She will make a $6,000 down payment and borrow the remaining with a 60-month loan that has an annual interest rate of 4.71%. Use the formula to determine Tatiana’s monthly car payment to the nearest dollar amount.
please help me with step by step
Answer:
$30,000 - $6,000 = $24,000
$24,000 to finance at 4.71% for 60 months
24,000 divided by 60 = $400/month + 4.71% ( $18.84) = $418.84/month.
Explanation:
Police officer placing sign outside a rail station that says 'Waiting Room for White Only.'
© 2012 The Associated Press
This police office is placing a sign outside a rail station. He is enforcing the ruling in
D.C. v. Heller
Plessy v. Ferguson
Marbury v. Madison
Brown v. Board of Education
Answer:
The answer would be "B" or Plessy V. Ferguson
Answer:
the answer is B, Plessy v. Ferguson.
Explanation:
Have a great day!! Hope this helps!!
This branch has Congress, the House of Representatives and the
Senate.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answer:
Legislative Branch
Explanation:
it contains all of those
Answer:
Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress.
Explanation:
What reasons did the president give for justifying his claim of executive privilege?
Answer:
To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.
Explanation:
Family law is handled by which type of court?
Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
gaily cort
Explanation:
guiiiiiiiifet6jnff
If your license is a must wear a correct of glass lenses you
Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.
Explanation:
What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless he has been informed of his right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything he says will be held against him in a court of law.
To address the widespread and growing concern of contaminated food causing serious injury and death to individuals throughout the United States, Congress passed a law stating that anyone intentionally distributing contaminated food is subject to criminal prosecution, civil fines, or both.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
This branch has the Supreme Court and District Courts.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answer: judicial branch
Explanation:
is it murder if you force someone up a tree and they fall?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
The purpose of the first juvenile courts was to step in when _____ failed.
A.diversion
B.parents
C.rehabilitation
D.Society
Answer:
D
Explanation:
society sucks
Describe three aspects of due process for a school seeking to suspend a student with disabilities.
Answer:
Students with disabilities have special schools where they are properly equipped.
Explanation:
As a matter of fact, Why does a school want to suspend a student with a disabiliy?
1.Maybe the student committed a crime.
2.The child's disability is affecting other students.
3.The child is constantly weakened and the environment condition is unsuitable for the child.
I'm not very sure of my answer but..
Explain what a budget is, and outline the main features of a budget.
Answer:
A budget is a financial document or an action plan which is prepared and used to project future income and expenses. It outlines an organisation's financial and operational goals. It can also include non- monetary information with the monetary information.
Answer:
A Budget is a plan expressed in quantitative usually monetary terms, covering a specified period of time, usually one year. Many companies refer to their annual budget as a profit plan since it shows the planned activities that the company expects to undertake in its responsibility centers in order to obtain its profit goals.
Explanation:
This branch has the power to impeach and override vetoes.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answer:
Legislative Branch
Explanation:
Read the attached opinion in Burnatoski v Butler Ambulance Service Co - Agency.pdf. One of the issues here was whether or not the city was legally responsible for the acts of a driver working for a separate ambulance company in which the city had only assisted the ambulance company to obtain a federal grant to help pay for the ambulance. Under the Pennsylvania Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, a municipality is immune from claims such as this, unless its employee is the operator of the vehicle. The proceedings indicated that the driver was not a city employee, after which the municipality was dismissed, but the ambulance company and driver remained as defendants. Did the City control or direct the activities of the driver to the extent that the City should be liable for the manner in which he operated the vehicle at the time of the accident? Please advocate for the plaintiff or the defendant and provide the basis for your position.
Answer:
cb
Explanation:
The plaintiff's argument may be that the City should be liable for the driver's actions because the City played a role in helping the ambulance company obtain a federal grant to pay for the ambulance.
Who is an advocate?In law, an advocate is a person who is professionally qualified to plead another's cause in a court of law.
The plaintiff may argue that the City should be held liable for the driver's actions because the City assisted the ambulance company in obtaining a federal grant to pay for the ambulance.
Furthermore, the plaintiff could argue that the City exercised some level of control or direction over the driver's actions while operating the ambulance.
Even though the driver was not technically a City employee, the plaintiff could argue that the City had some input or influence over the ambulance company's operations.
The defendant's argument, on the other hand, could be that the City had no control or direction over the driver's actions and thus should not be held liable for the accident.
The defendant could claim that the City's role was limited to assisting the ambulance company in obtaining the grant and that the City had no say in how the ambulance company operated.
The defendant may also claim that the driver was not a City employee and that the City had no direct influence over his actions.
Thus, the court must weigh the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to determine whether or not the City is liable for the driver's actions.
For more details regarding advocacy, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31316893
#SPJ2
A logically invalid argument with a premise logically equivalent to the conclusion.
Answer:
Since it is valid, the argument is such that if all the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. ... If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false. FALSE: It is possible for an invalid argument to have all true premises and a true conclusion.
