Why do the people do what they do in verse 31?
If criminal behavior is learned, who taught the first criminal?
Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel. At the last minute, her plans changed making it impossible for her to travel. She called her sister, Ravinder, and suggested that she make use of the room in her place. When Ravinder arrived at the motel, she was refused admittance to the room on the grounds that there was a waiting list and she was not on it. Was the motel within its rights to refuse her admittance? Why or why not?
Answer: Yes. The motel within its rights to refuse her admittance
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel but couldn't later travel and therefore called her sister, Ravinder, to make use of the motel room in her place.
We are further told that Ravinder was refused admittance to the room on the grounds that there was a waiting list and she was not on it.
Based on the nice scenario, the motel was within its rights to refuse her admittance. It should be noted that the hotel room wasn't booked in her name but rather booked in Manpreet's name. The thing that Manpreet could have done is to inform the motel when she realize that she couldn't come and change the terms of the contract by saying her sister will be coming. But in this scenario, the motel is within its rights to refuse her admittance.
The Federalist 10
Brutus 1
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution
In your essay, you must:
✓ Respond to the prompt with a defensible claim or thesis that establishes a line of reasoning.
✓ Support your claim with specific and relevant evidence.
✓ Use one piece of evidence from one of foundational documents listed above.
Answer:78
Explanation:78
Identify the woman in the picture.
The state of New York passes a law that prohibits transgender persons from going to the bathrooms of their choice. Max, an adult, identifies as a transgender female. Max’s parents, enraged at the law, file a lawsuit against the state of New York, claiming that the transgender bathroom law violates the U.S. Constitution in that it is discriminatory. 1) What is the state of New York’s best defense against this lawsuit? 2) What would you recommend to Max’s family to make the lawsuit stronger?
Answer and Explanation:
1. The state of New York can claim that they are within the rights defended by the bathroom bill (since this law allows the restriction of transgender people to bathrooms that are not determined by their gender of birth) and that the decision was made to maintain the safety of cisgender people.
2. I would recommend that the family look for facts that prove that this measure does not promote the safety of anyone, as there have never been cases of attacks by transgender individuals on cisgender individuals in public bathrooms, on the contrary, this measure causes insecurity for transgender individuals. , since there are countless cases of attacks on these individuals due to prejudice, homophobia and intolerance. In addition, the family may claim that the bathroom bill also advocates allowing transgender individuals to access toilets that match their gender identity, as a measure of security and promoting equality.
Debates must utilize all three purposes for public speaking: to inform, to entertain, and to persuade.
True or False
Answer: true
Explanation: good luck
list three minerals that are used around your house
Answer:
Quartz in mirrors
Graphite in pencil leads
Steel from knobs and hinges
Explanation:
Regarding age and gender related to violent crime victimization, choose the most accurate statement:
* a. Young males are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* b. Young females are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* c. Older males are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* d. Older females are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
Write a brief summary (one paragraph each of 3-5 sentences) of the New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Vernonia v. Acton cases.
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Answer:doing the same homework and struggling but here’s number 1
Explanation:
:)
The Crimes that are not reported to police are called the....
Answer:
Dark Figure of crime.
Explanation:
The dark (or hidden) figure of crime is a term employed by criminologists and sociologists to describe the amount of unreported or undiscovered crime.
An employees personal email composed and sent at work is protected by the right of privacy true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Employees' right to privacy in the workplace encompass an employee's personal information and activities at work. ( That include private emails)
What was the original purpose of profiling?
Informal criminal profiling has a long history. It was used as early as the 1880s, when two physicians, George Phillips and Thomas Bond, used crime scene clues to make predictions about British serial murderer Jack the Ripper's personality.
John Douglas in the year 1970 started the original profiling purpose for the FBI. Hence, the above statement is correct.
What is the Original Profiling Purpose?The original profiling purpose was John Douglas's watershed theory about criminalizing the fact and the idea regarding FBI promotions. The FBI used his technique to capture the criminals. The main purpose is the way in which criminal psychology has been taken into consideration.
The Original Profiling Purpose was described as the result of the primary purpose of the FBI's motive for the criminal activity.
Learn more about the Original Profiling Purpose here:
https://brainly.com/question/14343968
#SPJ2
Is America ready for a 3rd major political party? Explain.
Answer:
no because it's already divided enough
6. Why did the Supreme Court accept Gideon's Case?
The Court held that the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
here were we stand we shall have two winners of the daily give away so play your cards right my friends for u shall never see this today again
oh and please give me all of the food in ur fridge right now
ayoooooooo cool cool
in john 10 who are the sheep
Answer:
In this case, He contrasts His spiritual leadership with that of false teachers, including the hypocritical religious critics of His own era. Jesus previously identified Himself as "the Good Shepherd," saying that He was willing to die for the sake of His flock. This is a very different approach from a typical "hired" shepherd, who is inclined to run when there is danger. Spiritually, Jesus is the ultimate example of a shepherd willing to sacrifice Himself for the safety and health of His flock.
In the prior verse, Jesus echoed an important point made in His first analogy (John 10:1–6). There He referred to the way sheep instinctively learn to recognize the voice of their own shepherd. This reflects the close, knowing, personal relationship a "good shepherd" has with the sheep. Here, Jesus compares that closeness and intimacy with the relationship between God the Son and God the Father. This echoes other statements in the New Testament which imply that salvation through Jesus Christ brings us into an intimate family relationship with God (1 John 3:1; Romans 8:16–17).
What is difference between warrant of arrest and warrantless arrest?
Answer:
the difference is a warrant arrest is when law enforcement plans your arrest and a warrantless arrest is when it just happens like getting a traffic stop and them finding unexpected drugs.
Explanation:
There are many differences between a warrant arrest and the non-warrant arrest. The major difference between both the arrests is that while arresting a person with a warrant the law authorities were already prepared to arrest that with documents and permission of the court.
However, in a non-warrant arrest, the arrest is made without any preparation either for petty crimes or for such crimes which are dangerous for society but took place suddenly without the notice of the law authorities.
What is an arrest?The Arrest is made by the law authorities in order to regulate the law and order in the regions and also to protect the civilians from the crimes which can take place by the criminals.
The act of arrest doesn't declare a person a criminal but it begins the process of reaching the criminal by arresting the accused person.
Learn more about “arrest” here:
https://brainly.com/question/14286068
#SPJ2
when may a minor legally purchase alcohol in texas
Answer:
Texas alcohol laws permit adults aged 18 or older to tend bar. They may also serve alcohol in a venue for drinking on-site. Those 16 or older may sell beer and wine in stores selling it for consumption elsewhere. They must be age 21 to sell spirits (liquor) in such businesses.
Explanation:
im not sure a minor can. pretty sure its illegal.
Who is responsible for investigating potential wrong-doing by federal officials assigned to any of the executive departments and their respective
agencies and bureaus?
The General Services Administration
the inspector general
there is no oversight of federal officials
the attorney general
what is the difference between human acts and an act of man
Answer:
An act that is performed only by a human being and thus is proper to man. When a human being does such acts, they are called acts of man but not human acts. ... Acts of man, therefore, are acts shared in common by man and other animals, whereas human acts are proper to human beings.
Explanation:
Please mark as brainliest
Jessica Grayson is a secretary at Washington High School. She is in charge of ordering janitorial supplies from Joe's Cleaning Center. Jessica is also authorized to write and sign the checks for these supplies. Jessica is friends with Jake Emerson, who works at Joe's. Once a month, Jessica writes an order for $300 worth of supplies that the school really doesn't need. Jake signs the business manager's name from Joe's on the checks and gives them back to Jessica. She cashes the checks and deposits them into her own savings account. Jake makes sure the supplies are never delivered to the school. Are Jessica and Jake both committing a crime? If so, what crime(s)?
Answer: Jessica = Embezzlement
Jake = Forgery
Both = Conspiracy
Explanation:
• Jessica,s crime is embezzlement.
Embezzlement is when an individual misappropriates the fund that has been entrusted and placed in the person's care. In this case, Jessica steals the company's fund that is in her possession and this is a financial fraud.
• Jake's crime is forgery
Forgery is when a take signature, false document, or something else is being copied so as to deceive someone else. This is punishable as the person will be charged with fraud.
• The crime of both of them is conspiracy.
A conspiracy is simply when there is an agreement that takes place between two or more people when they want to commit a crime. In this scenario, both Jake and Jessica agreed to carry out the fraud.
in trials that receive a lot of media attention the judge my sequester ,the jury to prevent them from having access to outside influences like television or the Internet do you think this is fair ? why or why not?
Answer:
It is necessary to sequester the jury in order to avoid accidental or deliberate tainting by outside forces. I.E., The media or social media. The reason this can be a detriment is because you're basing your judgment with bias. Therefore, the trial is not impartial.
Explanation:
Judges have done this in high profile cases. The jury is more selective and more discreet.
When acceleration is positive does that mean it is always increasing in speed?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
it's more complicated than that.
acceleration can be positive but be slowing down in speed at the same time.
7. What was the Supreme Court ruling in Gideon?
Answer:
In 1963, The supreme court unanimously in favor of the Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts
Why has probation become so important to the operation of law enforcement?
It is the most commonly applied sanction.
It is the most underused sanction.
It has become a sadly ineffective sanction.
It is the sanction preferred by judges.
Answer: A. It's the most conmanly applied sanction
Explanation:
"Probation plays an extremely important role in the operation of the law enforcement and corrections systems in the United States. Probation is currently the most commonly applied correctional sanction," - from the article the very first paragraph in the page off Edge.
The President has the power to grant complete legal forgiveness for a crime that was committed through his power to grant
a pardon
a commutation
an executive agreement
amnesty
Answer:
The answer to the question is a pardon
Answer:
amnesty
Explanation:
An amnesty is an act of the sovereign power granting oblivion, or a general pardon, for a past offense, as to subjects concerned in an insurrection.
9. What ultimately happened to Clarence Earl Gideon?
Answer:
Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. ... After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court
No other branch of corrections is as closely involved with offenders as probation officers.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is because they interact with the people and help them stay good citizens and to prevent them from going back to a life of crime.
