Read the excerpt from Samuel Johnson's preface to A Dictionary of the English Language. From the authours which rose in the time of Elizabeth, a speech might be formed adequate to all the purposes of use and elegance. If the language of theology were extracted from H**ker and the translation of the Bible; the terms of natural knowledge from Bacon; the phrases of policy, war, and navigation from Raleigh; the dialect of poetry and fiction from Spenser and Sidney; and the diction of common life from Shakespeare, few ideas would be lost to mankind, for want of English words, in which they might be expressed. It is not sufficient that a word is found, unless it be so combined as that its meaning is apparently determined by the tract and tenour of the sentence; such passages I have therefore chosen. How is Johnson’s approach innovative? He defines literary and poetic terms. He studies the diction of everyday speech. He relies on the credibility of established authors. He refuses to include biblical terminology.

Answer:

He relies on the credibility of established authors

Based on the given passage, Johnson’s approach is innovative as  He relies on the credibility of established authors. Thus the correct option is B.

Inference in any literature piece refers to achieving the conclusion of any subject with the support of facts and evidence present in the particular piece of literature.

The passage asserts that A speech that serves all practical and elegant aims can be crafted by the authors who emerged throughout Elizabeth's reign. If the Bible's translation and the theology's vocabulary were taken directly.

He relies on the reputation of well-known authors, which enables him to offer reliable information about the subject. Sound arguments that are based in reality and credible information are necessary to support a claim.

Therefore, option B is appropriate.

Learn more about Inference, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29774121

#SPJ7