Question 6 of 10 What do megaliths imply about the Northern European civilizations that built them? A. They were monotheistic. B. They traded with Egypt. O C. They were warlike societies. O D. They had stratification. SUBMIT​

Answer:

Explanation:

Investigating the rights of the 2008 Constitution assigns peoples and nationalities and Afro-descendants to communities

Answer:

an arms race competition for supremacy in nuclear warfare between the united states, the soviet union and their respective allies during the cold war.

Explanation:

go

Answer:

In 1836 it was the site of the famous battle in defense of the Texas Revolution when Mexican President Santa Anna's army annihilated approximately 190 men after a 13-day siege.

Explanation:

Answer:

free speeches

Explanation:

The First Amendment right that was ruled on by the Warren Court is the right to free speech. The correct option is C.

The Warren Court successfully ended racial segregation in American public schools, increased defendants' constitutional rights, made sure that all people were represented equally in state legislatures, effectively banned state-sponsored prayer in public schools, and laid the groundwork for the legalization of abortion.

The Warren Court was a period of the Supreme Court's history when Earl Warren served as Chief Justice from 1953 to 1969. During this period, the court made a number of landmark decisions that expanded individual rights and liberties, including decisions that strengthened protections for freedom of speech and expression.

Some of the most famous cases include New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), which established the principle of actual malice in libel cases involving public figures, and Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), which upheld the right of students to express political views in public schools.

Thus, the ideal selection is option C.

Learn more about the Warren Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/14270054

#SPJ7

Answer:

B. Philippines Strategy for Sustainable Development.

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

What minerals are found with garnet?

Image result for Which mineral sample is most likely garnet?

The most commonly encountered minerals in the garnet group include almandine, pyrope, spessartine, andradite, grossular, and uvarovite. They all have a vitreous luster, a transparent-to-translucent diaphaneity, a brittle tenacity, and a lack of cleavage.

Answer:

He demonstrated that light and heavy objects gain the same amount of speed when falling.

Explanation:

Answer:

According to Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the president must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, be at least 35 years old, and have been a resident of the United States for 14 years

Explanation:

Studying it in my 7th grade history class right now.

Considering the available options and the historical perspective the United States Indian policy in the 1800s included all of the following EXCEPT "allowing native peoples, as independent nations, to negotiate and establish alliances with any other country."

This is because, during this period, the United States government did not allow or regard the native people of Native Americans to form or negotiate any alliance with any other country.

Instead, the United States government sent the Native Americans into the forest to establish themselves, while they take over their territory.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that during the 1800s, the United States stifled the lives of Native Americans rather than giving them the freedom to operate as an independent nation.

Learn more about Native Americans in the 19th century here: https://brainly.com/question/23202835

Answer:

the stunning 17th century white marble Taj Mahal

Explanation:

Answer: A portion of land in Texas became part of New Mexico. Texas became a slave state, a portion of California was added to Texas.

Explanation: Give me the brainiest

Answer:

D confident that god would see the america to victory

Explanation:

hope i help

Answer:

Thats too big so sryy

Explanation:

Answer:

Read the following

Explanation:

So Japan had a period of moderniziation (The Meiji Restoration Period) where they developed rapidly and managed to get a military and navy similar to the major powers. However, they weren't seen as equals to the Europeans. Now they weren't colonized because, they did isolate themselves but when they were forced out of isolation, they knew they had to modernize or they'll become like the Qing Dynasty (modern day china) and have imperial powers take advantage of them and there lands. So unlike Africa, Japan actually had a realistic chance of defending themselves from invaders, something that would make invading Japan costly. Not only that, but after 1900 it would be almost impossible to treat the Japanese like they did to Africa, as they rapidly grew a European like military and navy. Also, they were one of the 11 nations that sent troops to Peking in the boxer rebellion, which kind of showed how the Japanese weren't equal to the Qing Dynasty, at least in terms of military and navy as they were shown to be much stronger. Finally in 1904, the Russo-Japanese war begun, and while Russia had the largest army in the world at that time (in terms of troop count) the Japanese managed to invade Manchuria which was partially owned by the Russians at that time. Also, they destroyed the Russian naval fleet, ending the chance of Russia ever being able to invade Japan again (at least until WW2). So after the Russo-Japanese war, Japan was considered a great power, and most likely the next asian hegemony, which they were for a time in WW2.

Answer:The resulting Angell Treaty permitted the United States to restrict, but not completely prohibit, Chinese immigration. In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, which, per the terms of the Angell Treaty, suspended the immigration of Chinese laborers (skilled or unskilled) for a period of 10 years.

Explanation:I really am good with history and i had this on a test and got it right.

Answer:

A) federal job and training programs provided without discrimination and C) a board to rule on employment discrimination claims

Explanation:

Federal job and training programs provided without discrimination and a board to rule on employment discrimination claims are the two outcomes of the Fair Employment Practice Committee of 1941. Hence, option A and C are correct.

A training program is a carefully thought-out series of tasks intended to give employees the knowledge and skills they need to advance their careers. Achieving particular corporate objectives is the focus of each training program.

Different training plans may be available depending on the goal. Training programs are initiated by the company to make the employees more skilled and understand the work efficiently and effectively.

Thus, option A and C are correct.

For more details about training program, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12887580

#SPJ2

Answer:

ethos , pathos , logos

Explanation:

An example of ethos in his speech says, "...number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not..."

An example of pathos from his speech is, "...it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope."

An example of logos from Patrick Henry's speech is, "But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year?"

Answer:

Explanation:

i sory am jost A 5 grade help me go two me question

Answer:

True)

Explanation:

the Patriots. Patriot leader Lieutenant Colonel George Rogers Clark led Patriot forces to capture both Kaskaskia and Vincennes. True. After George Rogers Clark captured Vincennes, it remained in Patriot control.

hope that help mark me brinilylist pls

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

beehive

Explanation:

Answer:

Federalism is a system of government where there is one strong, central controlling authority.

Explanation:

Hope this helped! :)

Answer:

Explanation:

The series of events that led to the birth of modern science is called the Scientific Revolution. It occurred between about 1540 and 1700. Why would the birth of science be called a “revolution”? The answer is that science was a radical new idea. It was a completely different way of looking at the world.

Before the Scientific Revolution, most educated people who studied the world took guidance from the explanations given by authorities like ancient Greek writers and Catholic Church officials. After the Scientific Revolution, educated people placed more importance on what they observed and less on what they were told. They gained knowledge by observing the world around them and coming up with logical explanations for what they saw.

Answer:

okokokokokokoo

ExplanationIn philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.

It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.

Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?

Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.

The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.

This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.

Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.

If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?

This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.

Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.

A world where there is nothing is just an empty shell, you might reply; but the shell itself exists, is something. And even if there were no matter, arguably space could still exist, so could time; and these are not nothing.

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{The\ Renaissance}\\\\[/tex]

Hope it helps :) and let me know if you want to know more.