PLEASE HELP !!! With any question !!!
1: what evidence let the police to arrest Clarence Gideon ?
2: at the beginning of the trial why did Gideon not have a lawyer ?
3: how did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
4: how did Gideon‘s case get to the Supreme Court ?
5: why did the Supreme Court a sept Gideon‘s case ?
6: what was the supreme court ruling and Gideons?
7: what was the vote on the ruling
8: what ultimately happened to Clarence earl Garden?

Answer:78

Explanation:78

Answer: true

Explanation: good luck

Explanation:

ewan ko basta ang alam ko wala kang jowa

Answer:

Texas alcohol laws permit adults aged 18 or older to tend bar. They may also serve alcohol in a venue for drinking on-site. Those 16 or older may sell beer and wine in stores selling it for consumption elsewhere. They must be age 21 to sell spirits (liquor) in such businesses.

Explanation:

im not sure a minor can. pretty sure its illegal.

Answer:

Quartz in mirrors

Graphite in pencil leads

Steel from knobs and hinges

Explanation:

Answer:

Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. ... After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court

Answer:

The answer to the question is a pardon

Answer:

amnesty

Explanation:

An amnesty is an act of the sovereign power granting oblivion, or a general pardon, for a past offense, as to subjects concerned in an insurrection.

Answer:

Dark Figure of crime.

Explanation:

The dark (or hidden) figure of crime is a term employed by criminologists and sociologists to describe the amount of unreported or undiscovered crime.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached and you did not include the SSA case, we can only comment on formal authority.

When we use the term formal authority, we mean that is the kind of power that a company gives to a leader in a corporation. For example, when a new manager is hired by a company, he is granted the power to lead the company or any of its departments. At this moment, the manager has the power and influence over its employees.

However, there is another concept called informal authority, that does not come from the owners of the company or the high hierarchy. It comes from your employees, the people. It is the moment when people trust who you are and follow you for what you have shown, not for your position in the company.

That is why it is so important to have both kinds of authority because it is the best way to lead people under difficult circumstances.

Informal criminal profiling has a long history. It was used as early as the 1880s, when two physicians, George Phillips and Thomas Bond, used crime scene clues to make predictions about British serial murderer Jack the Ripper's personality.

John Douglas in the year 1970 started the original profiling purpose for the FBI. Hence, the above statement is correct.

The original profiling purpose was John Douglas's watershed theory about criminalizing the fact and the idea regarding FBI promotions. The FBI used his technique to capture the criminals. The main purpose is the way in which criminal psychology has been taken into consideration.

The Original Profiling Purpose was described as the result of the primary purpose of the FBI's motive for the criminal activity.

Learn more about the Original Profiling Purpose here:

https://brainly.com/question/14343968

#SPJ2

Answer:doing the same homework and struggling but here’s number 1

Explanation:

:)

Answer:

In this case, He contrasts His spiritual leadership with that of false teachers, including the hypocritical religious critics of His own era. Jesus previously identified Himself as "the Good Shepherd," saying that He was willing to die for the sake of His flock. This is a very different approach from a typical "hired" shepherd, who is inclined to run when there is danger. Spiritually, Jesus is the ultimate example of a shepherd willing to sacrifice Himself for the safety and health of His flock.

In the prior verse, Jesus echoed an important point made in His first analogy (John 10:1–6). There He referred to the way sheep instinctively learn to recognize the voice of their own shepherd. This reflects the close, knowing, personal relationship a "good shepherd" has with the sheep. Here, Jesus compares that closeness and intimacy with the relationship between God the Son and God the Father. This echoes other statements in the New Testament which imply that salvation through Jesus Christ brings us into an intimate family relationship with God (1 John 3:1; Romans 8:16–17).

Answer:

the difference is a warrant arrest is when law enforcement plans your arrest and a warrantless arrest is when it just happens like getting a traffic stop and them finding unexpected drugs.

Explanation:

There are many differences between a warrant arrest and the non-warrant arrest. The major difference between both the arrests is that while arresting a person with a warrant the law authorities were already prepared to arrest that with documents and permission of the court.

However, in a non-warrant arrest, the arrest is made without any preparation either for petty crimes or for such crimes which are dangerous for society but took place suddenly without the notice of the law authorities.

The Arrest is made by the law authorities in order to regulate the law and order in the regions and also to protect the civilians from the crimes which can take place by the criminals.

The act of arrest doesn't declare a person a criminal but it begins the process of reaching the criminal by arresting the accused person.  

Learn more about “arrest” here:

https://brainly.com/question/14286068

#SPJ2

Answer:

No

Explanation:

it's more complicated than that.

acceleration can be positive but be slowing down in speed at the same time.

Answer:

In 1963, The supreme court unanimously in favor of the Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts

Answer:

The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws

Explanation:

Answer:The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.

Answer: A. It's the most conmanly applied sanction

Explanation:

"Probation plays an extremely important role in the operation of the law enforcement and corrections systems in the United States. Probation is currently the most commonly applied correctional sanction," - from the article the very first paragraph in the page off Edge.

The Court held that the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

ayoooooooo cool cool

Answer:

It is necessary to sequester the jury in order to avoid accidental or deliberate tainting by outside forces. I.E., The media or social media. The reason this can be a detriment is because you're basing your judgment with bias. Therefore, the trial is not impartial.

Explanation:

Judges have done this in high profile cases. The jury is more selective and more discreet.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Employees' right to privacy in the workplace encompass an employee's personal information and activities at work. ( That include private emails)

Answer: Jessica = Embezzlement

Jake = Forgery

Both = Conspiracy

Explanation:

• Jessica,s crime is embezzlement.

Embezzlement is when an individual misappropriates the fund that has been entrusted and placed in the person's care. In this case, Jessica steals the company's fund that is in her possession and this is a financial fraud.

• Jake's crime is forgery

Forgery is when a take signature, false document, or something else is being copied so as to deceive someone else. This is punishable as the person will be charged with fraud.

• The crime of both of them is conspiracy.

A conspiracy is simply when there is an agreement that takes place between two or more people when they want to commit a crime. In this scenario, both Jake and Jessica agreed to carry out the fraud.

Answer:

no because it's already divided enough