Please help! I’ll give brainliest

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]1953125=5^9[/tex]

For a perfect square, its square root must be an integer

The square root of 1953125 i.e. [tex]\sqrt{1953125}=\sqrt{5^9}[/tex]

or, [tex]\sqrt{5^9}=5^\frac{9}{2}[/tex]

Clearly,  [tex]\frac{9}{2}[/tex] is not an integer so, [tex]5^{\frac{9}{2}}[/tex] is also not an integer

Hence, 1953125 is not a square number

Answer:

a) s × ($7.70 - $1.70) > $7,900

b) s > 1,306 sandwiches

c) 431 more sandwiches

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is

The given parameters are;

The constant total expenses (fixed cost), C = $7,900

The cost it takes to make each sandwich, [tex]p_s[/tex] = $1.70

The price at which the food truck sells its sandwiches, [tex]c_s[/tex] = $7.75

Where "s" represent the number of sandwiches sold, we have;

a) Therefore, the inequality that represent the number of sandwiches the food truck will have to sell each month to earn more money from selling sandwiches than it pays in expenses and sandwich costs is given as follows;

s × ([tex]c_s[/tex] - [tex]p_s[/tex]) > C

Substituting the known values, gives;

s × ($7.75 - $1.70) > $7,900.00

b) From the inequality, which we have;

s > $7,900/($7.75 - $1.70)

However, $7,900/($7.75 - $1.70) = 158,000/121 ≈ 1,305.79

We round up to the nearest whole number since we are counting sandwiches which are counted per each piece

Therefore;

s > 1,306 sandwiches

An explanation is that the food truck will have to sell more than 1,305 sandwiches to be earn more money than it pays in expenses and sandwich costs.

c) The amount in discount the food truck offers in a specific month = $1.50

Therefore, the amount the food truck sells the sandwich in the given month [tex]c_s[/tex] = $7.75 - $1.50 = $6.25

Therefore the number of sandwich the food truck company will have to sell on that month to earn more money from selling sandwiches than it pays the in expenses and sandwich cost, "s" is given as follows;

s × ([tex]c_s[/tex] - [tex]p_s[/tex]) > C

s × ($6.25 - $1.70) > $7,900, which gives;

s > $7,900/($6.25 - $1.70)

$7,900/($6.25 - $1.70) ≈ 1,73.26

We round up to get, s > 1,737

We round up

Therefore, the number of more (extra) sandwiches the food truck have to sell to earn money from selling sandwiches than it pays in expenses and food costs is the difference in the number of sandwiches it has to sell at $7.75 and $6.25 to earn more money than it pays in fixed expenses (costs) and the sandwich cost which is given as follows;

At $7.75 the number of sandwiches the food truck has to sell s > 1,306

At $1.70 the number of sandwiches the food truck has to sell is s > 1,737

The more number of sandwiches it has to sell = 1,737 - 1,306 = 431 more sandwiches

The more number of sandwiches it has to sell = 431 more sandwiches

(From which we check to have; 1306 + 431 = 1737 which is correct)

The inequality represents how many sandwiches, the food truck is [tex]s \times ($7.75 - $1.70) > $7,900.00[/tex]

The solution of the inequality is,1,305.79

The more number of sandwiches it has to sell is 1373 more sandwiches

Given that,

A local food truck specializes in gourmet grilled cheese sandwiches.

Each month, the owners of the truck have a constant total of $7,900 in expenses (salaries, truck loan, etc.) and it costs $1.70 per sandwich to make each sandwich.

The food truck sells its sandwiches for $7.75 each.

We have to determine,

Write an inequality to represent how many sandwiches, the food truck.

Solve the inequality.

To gain more sales, the food truck offers a discount one month of $1.50 off its sandwiches.

How many more sandwiches will it need to sell to earn more money from selling sandwiches than it pays in expenses and food costs

According to the question,

The constant total expenses (fixed cost), C = $7,900

The cost takes to make each sandwich,  = $1.70

The price at which the food truck sells its sandwiches,  = $7.75

Where "s" represents the number of sandwiches sold.

[tex]s \times (c_s-p_s)>c[/tex]

Substituting the known value in the equation,

[tex]s \times ($7.75 - $1.70) > $7,900.00[/tex]

       $7,900/($7.75 - $1.70)

       = 158,000/121

       ≈ 1,305.79

The nearest whole number since we are counting sandwiches which are counted per piece.

Therefore;

s > 1,306 sandwiches

An explanation is that the food truck will have to sell more than 1,305 sandwiches to earn more money than it pays in expenses and sandwich costs.

The number of sandwiches the food truck company will have to sell on that month to earn more money from selling sandwiches than it pays the in expenses and sandwich cost, "s" is given as follows;

[tex]s \times (c_s-p_s)>c[/tex]

s × ($6.25 - $1.70) > $7,900, which gives;

s > $7,900/($6.25 - $1.70)

$7,900/($6.25 - $1.70) ≈ 1,73.26

s > 1,737

Therefore, the number of more (extra) sandwiches the food truck have to sell to earn money from selling sandwiches than it pays in expenses and food costs is the difference in the number of sandwiches it has to sell at $7.75 and $6.25 to earn more money than it pays in fixed expenses (costs) and the sandwich cost which is given as follows;

At $7.75 the number of sandwiches the food truck has to sell s > 1,306

At $1.70 the number of sandwiches the food truck has to sell is s > 1,737

The more number of sandwiches it has to sell = 1,737 - 1,306 = 431 more sandwiches

The more number of sandwiches it has to sell = 431 more sandwiches

= 1306 + 431 = 1737

To know more about Inequality click the link given below.

https://brainly.com/question/21620502

Answer:

He used 1 5/6 bottles of water during practice.

Answer:

Step-He used 1 5/6 bottles of water during practice.by-step explanation:

hahah im a cheater

Answer:

£30

Step-by-step explanation:

To tackle these 'sharing' ratios problems, first find the total amount parts in the ratio.

1 : 6 = 1 + 6 = 7 parts

Now divide the total amount of parts by the total amount of money shared

35 / 7 = 5

Now multiply the answer by the value that is appropriate.

In this case, they want you to work out how much Ali recieved.

Ali's value is 6

6 × 5 = £30

hope this helps :)

If Abi and Ali shared £35 in a ratio of 1: of 6, Ali received £210.

It is described as the comparison of two quantities to determine how many times one obtains the other. The proportion can be expressed as a fraction or as a sign: between two integers.

It is given that, Abi and Ali shared £35 in a ratio of 1: of 6.

We have to apply operations in which we do the addition of numbers, subtraction, multiplication, and division. It has basic four operators that are +, -, ×, and ÷.

Suppose the share of Abi and Ali is 1x and 6x and the total amount they shared is  £35.As a result,

x+6x=£35

7x=£35

x=£5

The amount Ali received is found as,

=6x

= 6×£35

=£210

Thus, if Abi and Ali shared £35 in a ratio of 1: of 6, Ali received £210.

Learn more about the ratio here:

brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ2

Answer:

0.9y

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

its not a complete problem

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 1, 3, 4

1 (2, 7pi/3)

3 (2, -5pi/3)

4 (-2, 4pi/3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1 3 and 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Doing it on brainly but the other guy gave me the answers lol

Answer:I will try if i don’t know then I can’t but I will see

Step-by-step explanation:

You welcome

I'm looking through all of them but I need to find my notes from Geometry to be able to answer them.

Also I don't want to be wrong because I would feel so bad.

Answer:

325

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1:

Figure out what 162.5% is without the percentage symbol.

Percent is By the Hundred

To find what 162.5% as a number you have to divide.

Step 2:

Divided the percentage to make a number without it being a percent.

162.5% divided by 100= 1.625

Step 3:

Multiply 162.5% without the # being a percentage to 200.

1.625 x 200=325

Hope this helps

Answer:

0!

Step-by-step explanation:

If anything 0 is powered to a number, it will always be zero.

Answer:

the answer is -4,-1

Step-by-step explanation:

y1-y2

x1-x2

Answer:I think its A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5.567764363 or rounded off to two decimal places 5.57

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculator

Answer:

D. The product of a constant factor 5 and a 2-term factor x+2

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope that helps

Answer:

5y + 30

Step-by-step explanation:

5(y+6)

5y + 30

Answer:

option one is right

Step-by-step explanation:

the very first triangle is the 30 -69 -90 degree triangle ️

Answer:

outlier

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5/12

Step-by-step explanation:

8/12 + -3/12

Answer:

2/3 - 1/4 =

8/12 - 3/12 = 5/12

:)

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

You can. It's just a method used however.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3x+2y

Step-by-step explanation:

Cost times quantity

Answer:

3x+2y

Step-by-step explanation:

You add the x and y to the end because you do not know how many pounds you buy.

Answer:

The equation is 3n + 13 = 40 The triplets are 9 years old

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-24n+48

Step-by-step explanation:

Primarily, horizontal lines mean zero slope. Therefore the equation is y= 3 because you are only left with the y-intercept at this point. The rate of change is another way of saying slope. Function 2's slope is 5 and function 1's slope is 0. Therefore, the rate of change of function 2 is greater than the rate of change of function 1 by 5.  

5 is the answer.

hope this helps :)

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

48x i belive is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

If 5x + 4 = 14,

then x = 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

5x + 4 = 14

–4 –4

5x = 10

÷5 ÷5

x = 2

Answer:

10, 21, 36, 12, 24, 5, 33, 14

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The number of 3-point shots made is two more than half of the number of 2-point shots made.

Assume the number of 2-point shots is x.

Number of 3-point = 0.5x + 2

The relevant expression will be:

x + (0.5x + 2) = 20

1.5x + 2 = 20

1.5x = 20 - 2

x = 18/1.5

x = 12 shots

3 point shots = 20 - 12 = 8

There were 12 2-point shots and 8 3-point shots.

Total points :

= (12 * 2) + (8 * 3)

= 48 points

Answer:

withdraw decrease loss

Step-by-step explanation: