I need to know the answer please

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (f·g)(x) = 2x^3 +6x^2 -4x -12

Step-by-step explanation:

The distributive property is used to find the expanded form of the product.

  (f·g)(x) = f(x)·g(x) = (x +3)(2x^2 -4) = x(2x^2 -4) +3(2x^2 -4)

  = 2x^3 -4x +6x^2 -12

  (f·g)(x) = 2x^3 +6x^2 -4x -12

Answer:

V = 64.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Since this is a right triangle, we can use trig functions

cos V = adj side/ hypotenuse

cos V = 3/7

Taking the inverse cos of each side

cos ^-1 ( cos V) = cos ^-1 (3/7)

V=64.62306

Rounding to the nearest tenth

V = 64.6

Answer:

V=64.6

Step-by-step explanation:

the same thing as other guy, lol

Answer:

The number is 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the number be x,

Four times the number= 4x

two times the same number= 2x

So we have ,

4x – 2x = 10

2x = 10

x = 5

Therefore the number is 5

first invert fraction of the slope from 4/1 to 1/4 and switch sign. then figure out the y-intercept

the algebraic approach would work like this:

-4x + 10 = 1/4x + b

plug in what you got, here: the intersection information

-4*(4) + 10 = 1/4*(4) + b

-16 + 10 = 1 + b

-6 = 1 + b

-7 = b

QUESTION:- An artist uses 200 tiles to create a tessellation design that covers a rectangle with dimensions 2 ft by 3 ft. He will cover a wall with dimensions 10 ft by 15 ft using the same design and tiles of the same size. How many tiles will he need to cover the entire wall?

ANSWER:-

CASE 2:-

IT IS GIVEN THAT DESIGN AND SIZE OF TILES R SAME SO WE CAN CONSIDER THAT SAME NUMBER OF TILES WILL COVER SAME AREA IN BOTH CASE.

WE CAN USE UNITARY METHOD FOR SOLVING THIS:-

[tex]6ft² \: is \: covered \: using \: 200 \: tiles \\ 1ft² \: is \: covered \: using \: \frac{200}{6} \: tiles \\ 150ft² \: is \: covered \: using \: \frac{200 \times 150}{6} \: tiles \\ 150ft² \: is \: covered \: using \: \frac{200 \times \cancel{150}^{ \: \: 25} }{ \cancel6 {}^{ \: 1} } \: tiles \\ 150ft² \: is \: covered \: using \: 200 \times 25 \: tiles \\ 150ft² \: is \: covered \: using \: 5000 \: tiles[/tex]

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

2+4 = 6

..............

Answer:

Here is your answer omisha

2+4=6

NA = A + W

By adding one unit to length, we increase the overall area by the width of the rectangle. This is because the formula for the area of a rectangle is A = l x w. So, NA = (l + 1) x w = (l x w) + w = A + w.

Answer:

The mean is of -0.4 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the central limit theorem and subtraction of normal variables.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

Subtraction between normal variables:

When two normal variables are subtracted, the mean is the difference of the means, while the standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the variances.

Mean of the sample of 64 Duracell:

By the Central Limit Theorem, 4.1 hours.

Mean of the sample of 64 Eveready:

By the Central Limit Theorem, 4.5 hours.

Mean of the difference?

Subtraction of normal variables, so we subtract the means.

4.1 - 4.5 = -0.4

The mean is of -0.4 hours.

1 & 2:The null and alternate hypotheses are

H0 : u = 16 vs Ha: u < 16

The null hypothesis is that the mean is 16 ounces against the claim that it is less than 16 ounces.

3:The significance level is 0.05

4. Critical Value:

The critical region for significance level = 0.05  for one tailed test is z< ± 1.645

5.The test statistic

The test statistic to be used is

z= x- μ/σ/√n

z= 15.8-16/0.32/√20

z= -0.2/ 0.071556

z= -2.7950

6. The p-value ≈ 0.00259 for one tailed test.

7. Reject H0

Since the calculated value of z= -2.7950 is less than z∝= -1.645  we reject the null hypothesis.

8. Conclusion:

There is enough evidence to  support the inspector's claim that the mean number of ounces of coffee in the jars.

https://brainly.com/question/15980493

Graph

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Its not a linear function; there is no consistent rate of change between each of the points.

Answer:

za/2: Divide the confidence level by two, and look that area up in the z-table: .95 / 2 = 0.475. ...

E (margin of error): Divide the given width by 2. 6% / 2. ...

: use the given percentage. 41% = 0.41. ...

: subtract. from 1.

Answer:

12x - 28° = 116°

7x + 32° = 116°

Step-by-step explanation:

12x - 28° and 7x + 32° are vertical angles. Vertical angles are congruent.

Therefore, to find the measure of each angle, we have to set each equation equal to each other as follows:

12x - 28° = 7x + 32°

Collect like terms

12x - 7x = 28 + 32

5x = 60

Divide both sides by 5

5x/5 = 60/5

x = 12

✔️12x - 28°

Plug in the value of x

12(12) - 28

= 144 - 28

= 116°

✔️7x + 32°

7(12) + 32

= 84 + 32

= 116°

Answer:

22

Step-by-step explanation:

(5x2) + (3x2) + (3x2)

22 square units

Answer from Gauthmath

The operation manager is responsible to identify whether there are errors in quality of the tires manufactured.

There are three different shifts and each shift has different team of workers who manufacture tires. For this we test hypothesis as;

H0 ; Quality of tire manufactured is independent on shifts

Ha ; Quality of tires manufactured is dependent on shifts.

The p value of chi squared test is greater than the significance level therefore we reject the null hypothesis.

This hypothesis reach to conclusion that quality of tires is dependent on shifts, which means there are differences in quality among the three shifts.

Learn more at https://brainly.com/question/24365931

Answer:

6 percent increase

Step-by-step explanation:

2650 divided by 2500 gives you 1.06 which means if 2500 is 100 percent 2650 would be 106 percent so the answer is a 6 percent increase

Answer:

6%

Step-by-step explanation:

another way of doing this type of calculation is...

NEW-OLD  =  2650-2500  = 150     = .06 = 6%

   OLD                2500            2500

hi  

x/6 = 10

In a equation , you can use every math operation you know as long as you do the same thing on both sides.  

Here we have   x/6 = 10  

But what I want is  x .  

Here X is split in 6.  So  I 'm going to multiplicate all by 6 to find the original amount of X  

In bold operation that are often not written but that you must understand to do that kind of exercices.

So  :  x/6 = 10

      (x/6) *6  = 10 *6

        6x/6 =  60

             x = 60

Answer:

1 balloon is 4/ 1 cake is 7

Step-by-step explanation:

2 balloons is 8/ 3 cakes are 21 add together you get 29.

Answer:

f(x) = 16*0.75^x

Step-by-step explanation:

first off let's use this coordinate (the one given) :

(0,16)

let's substitute this into the equation with x being 0 and f(x) being 16

16 = a*b^0

*anything to the power of 0 is 1*

so:

a = 16

now use the second coordinate :

(1,12)

and do the same by substituting 1 for x and 12 for f(x), we also know what 'a' is:

12 = 16*b^1

12 = 16 * b

b = 3/4

so :

f(x) = 16*0.75^x

Answer:

f(x) = 16(.75)^x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

610.48

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for compound interest is

A = P(1+r/n) ^nt  where

A is the amount in the account

P is the principle

r is the interest rate

n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year

t is the time in years

A = 500(1+.05/12) ^12*4

A = 500(1+.0041666666) ^48

A = 500(1.0041666666) ^48

A = 500*1.220895355

A =610.4476775

Rounding to the nearest cent

A = 610.48

Answer:

3rd option

Step-by-step explanation:

(1/2)^-2t

= (2^-1)^-2t

= 2^2t

= (2^2)^t

Answered by GAUTHMATH

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  {-5.2555, 1.1278 ± 1.2579i}

Step-by-step explanation:

Descarte's rule of signs tells you there are 0 or 2 positive real roots and 1 negative real root. A graph shows you the negative roots is irrational, and the positive roots are complex.

There are formulas for solving equations of this sort. The method you use will depend on whether you need an exact result or just a numerical approximation. Exact results can be obtained in terms of radicals or in terms of trig functions.

The first attachment is from a freely available solver. It gives 4 decimal places, which is sufficient for many purposes.

The second attachment is the graph, along with the quadratic that results from dividing f(x) by the factor that gives the real root. While the values shown on the graph are to 3 decimal places, the calculator can be used to find them to greater precision. (We have used Newton's Method iteration to find the real root to 12 significant figures.)

Answer:

36 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to find 40% of 90 miles

40% * 90

.40 * 90

36 miles

We have to find travelled distance inorder to find this we have to find 40℅ of 90miles

[tex]\\ \Large\sf\longmapsto 90\times 40\℅[/tex]

[tex]\\ \Large\sf\longmapsto 90\times \dfrac{40}{100}[/tex]

[tex]\\ \Large\sf\longmapsto 9\times 4[/tex]

[tex]\\ \Large\sf\longmapsto 36miles [/tex]

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember: Each layer has 6 cubes. Step 3 Count the cubes. cubes Multiply the base and the height to check your answer. So, the volume of Jorge's rectangular prism is cubic centimeters. if wrong very sorry

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

took the test

Recall that

[tex]\sin(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}[/tex]

Differentiating the power series series for y(x) gives the series for y'(x) :

[tex]y(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n \implies y'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty na_nx^{n-1}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)a_{n+1}x^n[/tex]

Now, replace everything in the DE with the corresponding power series:

[tex]y'-2xy = 6\sin(3x) \implies[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)a_{n+1}x^n - 2\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^{n+1} = 6\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{(3x)^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}[/tex]

The series on the right side has no even-degree terms, so if we split up the even- and odd-indexed terms on the left side, the even-indexed [tex](n=2k)[/tex] series should vanish and only the odd-indexed [tex](n=2k+1)[/tex] terms would remain.

Split up both series on the left into even- and odd-indexed series:

[tex]y'(x) = \displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} + \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+2)a_{2k+2}x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]-2xy(x) = \displaystyle -2\left(\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k}x^{2k+1} + \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2k+2}\right)[/tex]

Next, we want to condense the even and odd series:

• Even:

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2k+2}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2(k+1)}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2(k+1)}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_{2(k-1)+1}x^{2k}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_{2k-1}x^{2k}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \bigg((2k+1)a_{2k+1} - 2a_{2k-1}\bigg)x^{2k}[/tex]

• Odd:

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty 2(k+1)a_{2(k+1)}x^{2k+1} - 2\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k}x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2(k+1)}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2k+2}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1}[/tex]

Notice that the right side of the DE is odd, so there is no 0-degree term, i.e. no constant term, so it follows that [tex]a_1=0[/tex].

The even series vanishes, so that

[tex](2k+1)a_{2k+1} - 2a_{2k-1} = 0[/tex]

for all integers k ≥ 1. But since [tex]a_1=0[/tex], we find

[tex]k=1 \implies 3a_3 - 2a_1 = 0 \implies a_3 = 0[/tex]

[tex]k=2 \implies 5a_5 - 2a_3 = 0 \implies a_5 = 0[/tex]

and so on, which means the odd-indexed coefficients all vanish, [tex]a_{2k+1}=0[/tex].

This leaves us with the odd series,

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2k+2}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1} = 6\sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{x^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

[tex]\implies 2(k+1)a_{2k+2} - 2a_{2k} = \dfrac{6(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

We have

[tex]k=0 \implies 2a_2 - 2a_0 = 6[/tex]

[tex]k=1 \implies 4a_4-2a_2 = -1[/tex]

[tex]k=2 \implies 6a_6-2a_4 = \dfrac1{20}[/tex]

[tex]k=3 \implies 8a_8-2a_6 = -\dfrac1{840}[/tex]

So long as you're given an initial condition [tex]y(0)\neq0[/tex] (which corresponds to [tex]a_0[/tex]), you will have a non-zero series solution. Let [tex]a=a_0[/tex] with [tex]a_0\neq0[/tex]. Then

[tex]2a_2-2a_0=6 \implies a_2 = a+3[/tex]

[tex]4a_4-2a_2=-1 \implies a_4 = \dfrac{2a+5}4[/tex]

[tex]6a_6-2a_4=\dfrac1{20} \implies a_6 = \dfrac{20a+51}{120}[/tex]

and so the first four terms of series solution to the DE would be

[tex]\boxed{a + (a+3)x^2 + \dfrac{2a+5}4x^4 + \dfrac{20a+51}{120}x^6}[/tex]

Answer:

Translation 2 units to the right

Vertical stretch by a factor of 3

Translation 1 unit up

Step-by-step explanation:

Correct on plato :}

Answer:

12 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the amount of hours it takes Leroy to catch up to Kevin equal x. Since speed multiplied by time is distance, Leroy would have run a total of 6x miles(6*x). Kevin already had a head start of 24 minutes, which is the same as 2/5 of an hour. In 2/5 an hour, Kevin ran 2 miles as 2 is 2/5 *5. For the next x hours his distance would be a total of 5x(5*x). This means, after x hours, Kevins distance is 5x + 2. In this case, catching up to someone is the same as having the same distance value. This means we can set the two expressions equal to each other, and solve:

6x = 5x + 2

x = 2

The time it took Leroy to catch up is 2 hours, but we are looking for the distance, which is represented by 6x. We substitute in 2 to get:

6(2) = 12

This means Leroy had to run 12 miles.

Answer:

[tex]\frac{121}{14} = 8\frac{9}{14}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

option A 5

I hope it's correct

.....

Answer:

The answer is "Option a, Option b, and Option d".

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given question it is used to stratifying the sampling if the population of this scenario it flights takes off when it is divided via some strata.

Answer:

For each day of the week, randomly select 5% of all flights that depart on that day of the week.

Divide all flights into the following 4 groups on the basis of scheduled departure time: before 9:00 am, 9:00 am to 1:00 pm, 1:00 pm to 5:00 pm, and after 5:00 pm. Randomly select 5% of the flights in each group.

Divide the airports from which the airline's flights depart into 4 regions: Northeast, Northwest, Southwest, and Southeast. Randomly select 5% of all flights departing from airports in each region.

Step-by-step explanation:

ll sampling methods that divide the flights into a small number of mutually exclusive categories are appropriate. These methods include all flights on the basis of a characteristic that might be associated with the variable being investigated and randomly selects a proportionate number of flights from each group.