Answer: C. They passed the Reconstruction Act of 1867, which put more power in the hands of the southern states.
Explanation: Took the test
The Radical Republicans react when Johnson vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 in the following way: They got enough lawmakers to override his veto and pass legislation anyway. The correct option is B.
When President Andrew Johnson vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the Radical Republicans, who held a significant majority in Congress, reacted by mobilizing enough lawmakers to override his veto. The Civil Rights Act aimed to protect the civil rights of African Americans in the United States, granting them citizenship and equal protection under the law.
Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about Civil Rights Act of 1866 here:
https://brainly.com/question/29392385
#SPJ2
The complete question might be:
How did the Radical Republicans react when Johnson vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866?
A. They impeached him, but they were unable to remove him from office.
B. They got enough lawmakers to override his veto and pass legislation anyway
C. They passed the Reconstruction Act of 1867 instead.
D. They gave up on their ambitions to make massive changes during Reconstruction
This photograph of African American sharecroppers was taken around 1900: A photograph shows an African American man and woman picking cotton in a large field. There are trees in the background and a large basket full of cotton in the foreground. © Kean Collection / Getty Images / Universal Images Group/ Image Quest 2015 Which of the following conclusions can be drawn about the man in this image? He spent most of his time growing food for his family. He was likely to own the land he farmed and his house.
Based on the photo, the conclusion we can make of the man is that he spent most of his time growing food for his family.
Why can we make this conclusion?Sharecroppers such as these African Americans did not own their land and were often subjected to discriminatory conditions that made it hard to grow crops commercially.
The food they grow is most often just enough to feed their families which is what the man is doing.
Find out more on sharecropping at https://brainly.com/question/2062987.
Answer: He was likely disenfranchised by poll taxes and literacy tests.
Explanation: That's the Correct answer.
In 1868, the 14th amendment to the U.S.
constitution reversed the Dred Scott ruling.
S
According to the amendment, who is considered a
citizen of the United States?
The descendants of the founding fathers
Only White men
Only the formerly enslaved
All people born in the United States
O
DONE
Answer:
In 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment overturned the Dred Scott decision by granting citizenship to all those born in the United States, regardless of color.
Think this is it.
Answer:
In 1868, the 14th amendment to the U.S. constitution reversed the Dred Scott ruling.
According to the amendment, who is considered a citizen of the United States?
The descendants of the founding fathers
Only White men
Only the formerly enslaved
All people born in the United States
Explanation:
D
Why did Thucydides criticize the Delian League?
The Athenians offers the melians an ultimatum surrender and pay tribute to Athens or be destroyed. The Athenians don't wish to waste time arguing over the morality of the situation. Thucydides believe that the Peloponnesian war represented an event of unmatched importance.
Brinkmanship was a bold, aggressive idea because it required drastically decreasing defense spending. engaging in lengthy peace talks with enemies. bluffing an enemy into thinking it would be attacked. invading a nation to force it to surrender.
The reason for which Brinkmanship had been considered a bold, as well as, an aggressive idea would be:
What is Brinkmanship?Brinkmanship is defined as the hunt towards a particular benefit by taking a risk instead of giving up. Brinkmanship is the practice of trying to achieve a profitable outcome by pushing dangerous events on the brink of an ongoing conflict.
This strategy is based on international politics, foreign policy, labor relations, modern military strategy, and high-profile cases.
The idea is considered an aggressive idea because it involves a greater and more dangerous level of risk i.e. "pretending an attack to take the enemy down.'
However, the idea is dangerous but it contains an advantage on the hand if it gets successful.
Thus, option C is the correct answer that is bluffing an enemy into thinking it would be attacked.
To learn more about Brinkmanship, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/807188
Answer:
bluffing an enemy into thinking it would be attacked.
Explanation:
The first state to leave the union after the election of 1860 was... question 10 options: south carolina georgia mississippi north carolina
The 1860 election was won by Lincoln and South Carolina was the first state to withdraw from the union.
Why was the 1860 election important in U.S history?In this election, Lincoln won the more popular and electoral votes than any candidate.
South Carolina immediately withdraw from the union after the 1860s election.
Therefore, option A appropriately describes the state who left the union.
Learn more about the 1860 election here:
https://brainly.com/question/232474
What was the relationship like between Russia and the U.S. during the Cold War?
Answer:
Very distrusting but also fearful of one another
Explanation:
The Cold War is a phrase meant to describe the period between 1945 (when WWII ended) and 1991 (when the USSR ended). This was a time when America and the Soviet Union were competing to become the world's most dominant country, and also were competing to have their economic systems be the dominant economic system within the world (the US was capitalism and the USSR was communism). During this time there was never directly a fight between the two countries, but they were constantly allying themselves with other countries to become more powerful, building increasingly more dangerous nuclear weapons, spying on one another, and involving themselves in what's called a proxy was (such as the Vietnam war) where they were directly fighting but took opposite sides in an ongoing conflict.
Did Tibbets’s description of the destruction to Hiroshima reflect what the photograph shows?
The photograph also describe Tibbets’s description of the destruction to Hiroshima.
Who is Paul Tibbet?Paul Tibbet is a general who hailed form America, he was known for been the colonel that lead the bomber.
The bomber happened in Japan and it led to destruction of many properties which he described.
Photographs were taken to serves as a reference of this happening.
Therefore, The photograph also describe the destruction to Hiroshima.
Learn more on Hiroshima here,
https://brainly.com/question/8242127
help me brainiest if right
When the french left vietnam, the united states stepped in to.
Answer:
To fight against communism because the north vietnam wanted a communist rule but the south vietnam didnt wanted , which led a war between them. And US stepped in to help the South Vietnam to fight against North Vietnam. Later, US left because they got tired and Vietnam was in communist rule (hope these helps also can you give brainlist and a high amount of point pls)
Evaluate whether or not the term "absolute monarchy" accurately describes Louis XIV's rule.
Answer: Because he alone had to answer to God, King Louis XIV was an absolute king.
Explanation: "absolute monarchy"
An absolute monarchy is one in which the king represents God on Earth and has absolute power over all others.
The rule of Louis XIV can be characterized as an "absolute monarchy." King Louis XIV was an absolute monarch, meaning that only he had to account for God.
What is monarchy?In a monarchy, the monarch serves as the head of state for life or until he or she abdicates. The monarch's political legitimacy and power can range from limited and primarily symbolic to wholly dictatorial, and it can extend to the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.
A monarchy that grants the king absolute control over everyone else is known as an absolute monarchy. It is possible to refer to Louis XIV's rule as an "absolute monarchy." Being an absolute king, Louis XIV was the only one who had to answer to God.
Therefore, The rule of Louis XIV can be characterized as an "absolute monarchy." King Louis XIV was an absolute monarch,
Learn more about monarchy here:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ2
