find a, b, and c please and thank u

Answer:

y = 1566.67x + 1716.67

is the actual answer..

The linear equation that can be used to approximate the data distribution is y = 1566.67x + 1716.67.

Linear equations are equation involving one or more expressions including variables and constants and the variables are having no exponents or the exponent of the variable is 1.

Linear equations may include one or more variables.

Given two points on the line.

(0.5, 2500) and (3.5, 7200)

Slope intercept form of a linear equation is y = mx + c, where m is the slope and c is the y intercept.

Slope = (7200 - 2500) / (3.5 - 0.5)

          = 4700 / 3

          = 1566.67

So the equation is, y = 1566.67x + c

Substitute the point (0.5, 2500) to the equation.

2500 = (1566.67 × 0.5) + c

c = 1716.67

So the equation is, y = 1566.67x + 1716.67

Hence the required equation is y = 1566.67x + 1716.67.

Learn more about Linear Equations here :

https://brainly.com/question/29739212

#SPJ2

Answer:

according to my calculations syour mada

Using the t-distribution, as we have the standard deviation for the sample, we could claim that the mean weight in pounds is in the interval (79.1, 85.7).

The confidence interval is:

[tex]\overline{x} \pm t\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which:

The critical value, using a t-distribution calculator, for a two-tailed 99% confidence interval, with 100 - 1 = 99 df, is t = 2.6259.

The other parameters have values given by:

[tex]\overline{x} = 82.4, s = 12.6, n = 100[/tex].

We could claim that the mean is any value in the 99% confidence interval, which has bounds given by:

[tex]\overline{x} - t\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} = 82.4 - 2.6259\frac{12.6}{\sqrt{100}} = 79.1[/tex]

[tex]\overline{x} - t\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} = 82.4 + 2.6259\frac{12.6}{\sqrt{100}} = 85.7[/tex]

More can be learned about the t-distribution at https://brainly.com/question/16162795

Answer:

y = cos 2/3 x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

14.3 Cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: A^2+B^2=C^2

Step 2: 3^2+14^2=C^2

Step 3: 9+196=C^2

Step 4: 205=C^2

Step 5: 14.3=C

Step-by-step explanation:

1)

[tex] \sin(theta) = \frac{opposite \: side}{hypotenuse} [/tex]

[tex] \sin(30) = \frac{x}{10} = \frac{1}{2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{x }{1} = \frac{10}{2} [/tex]

[tex]x = 5[/tex]

In right Angles traingle

By using Pythagoras theorm

we get

x²+y²=10²

25+y²=100

y²=75

y=5√3

x=5,y=5√3

2)

Area of equilateral traingle =

[tex] \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{4} {a}^{2} [/tex]

required area

[tex] \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{4} \times {6}^{2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{36 \sqrt{3} }{4} [/tex]

[tex]9 \sqrt{3} [/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=-2/1+4

or y=-2+4

Step-by-step explanation:

to find the slope, you count from one point of intersection to the next and the way it works is y/x so the line from one point to the next goes down 2 (making it negative also) and over 1, so -2/1 is your slope, and for the b part.. its just where the line intersects on the y axis (the line that goes up and down) so it would be 4

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

using the sine ratio in the right triangle.

sin23° = [tex]\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{x}{7}[/tex] ( multiply both sides by 7 )

7 × sin23° = x , then

x ≈ 2.7 ( to the nearest tenth )

----------------------------------------------------

using the tangent ratio in the right triangle

tan x = [tex]\frac{opposite}{adjacent}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{27}{17}[/tex] , then

x = [tex]tan^{-1}[/tex] ( [tex]\frac{27}{17}[/tex] ) ≈ 57.8° ( to the nearest tenth )

Answer: About 5.59

Step-by-step explanation:

        The mean absolute deviation (MAD) is where you subtract the mean from each value, find the absolute value of that value, and then find the average of those values.

        Here is what it looks like.

[Step 1]

        Find the average.

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{52+65+63+48+52+53+60}{7} =\frac{393}{7}=56.14[/tex]

[Step 2]

       Find the absolute value of each data from the mean.

|52 - 56.14| = 4.14

|65 - 56.14| = 8.86

|63 -  56.14| = 6.86

|48 -  56.14| = 8.14

|52 -  56.14| = 4.14

|53 -  56.14| = 3.14

|60 -  56.14| = 3.86

[Step 3]

      Find the average of these values.

[tex]\displaystyle\frac{4.14 + 8.86 + 6.86+8.14+4.14+3.14+3.86}{7} =\frac{39.14}{7}=5.59[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2.25m + 2(2.25m) + 90 cm =

2.25m + 4.50m + 90 cm

6.75m + 90 cm

1 cm = 0.01m...so 90 cm = 90 * 0.01 = 0.9m

6.75m + 0.9m = 7.65m <===

2.25m + 2(2.25m) + 90 cm =

2.25m + 4.50m + 90 cm

6.75m + 90 cm

1 cm = 0.01m...so 90 cm = 90 * 0.01 = 0.9m

6.75m + 0.9m = 7.65m

OR../=-

1m = 100 cm....so 7.65m = 7.65 * 100 = 765 cm

Answer:

2.4 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

12/5=2.4

To get 5 equal parts of 12, you have to do 12 divided by 5.

Answer:

the surface area of the prism is equal to 202 m^2

Step-by-step explanation:

The surface area of the prism is equal to

SA=2B+Ph

where

B is the area of the base

P is the perimeter of the base

h is the height of the prism

Find the area of the base B

B=LW=4*5=20m^2

Find the perimeter of the base P

P = 2(L+W) = 2 (4+5) = 18 m

Find the surface area ----> 

SA = 2B + Ph = 2(20) + 18(9) = 202 m^2

btw m^2 is stand for square meter, also called the meter squared! (just if ur wondering)

Answer:

x = -6 and x = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

For the fraction to be undefined, find the zeros of the polynomial of the denominator.

Answer:

x + y = 59

x = 8 + y

Step-by-step explanation:

Joey: x hours

Chandler: y hours

total hours is sum of both:

x+y = 59

Joey (x) worked 8 more hours than chandler (y)

x = 8 + y

Answer:

10.5 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

This problem is using scaling.

Basically:

2.5(RV) = WZ

Meaning our scale factor is 2.5.

Multiply 4.2 * 2.5

Your answer is 10.5 ft.

Using the normal distribution, it is found that there is a 16% probability that a randomly selected score is greater than 590.

The z-score of a measure X of a normally distributed variable with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex] is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

In this problem, the mean and the standard deviation are, respectively, given by [tex]\mu = 510[/tex] and [tex]\sigma = 80[/tex].

The probability that a randomly selected score is greater than 590 is one subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 590, hence:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{590 - 510}{80}[/tex]

Z = 1

Z = 1 has a p-value of 0.84.

1 - 0.84 = 0.16.

0.16 = 16% probability that a randomly selected score is greater than 590.

More can be learned about the normal distribution at https://brainly.com/question/24663213

Answer: ax - 2bx plus 3a - 6b

Step-by-step explanation: I’m not so sure with this but it might help

From the linear function formed by the points given in the table, it is found that the x-intercept is of -14.

A linear function is modeled by:

y = mx + b

In which:

In this problem, when x increases by 20, y decays by 6, hence the slope is given by:

[tex]m = -\frac{6}{20} = -0.3[/tex]

Then:

y = -0.3x + b.

When x = -54, y = 12, hence:

y = -0.3x + b

12 = -0.3(-54) + b.

b = -4.2.

Thus, the equation is:

y = -0.3x - 4.2.

The x-intercept is the value of x when y = 0, hence:

-0.3x - 4.2 = 0.

x = -4.2/0.3

x = -14

More can be learned about linear functions at https://brainly.com/question/24808124

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

rate plsss

The given expression is equivalent to [tex]\rm -2(x-7)^2+118[/tex]price is $7 option first is correct.

A quadratic expression is a second-degree algebraic expression represented by the:

[tex]\rm ax^2+bx+c=0[/tex] ........(1)

Where a, b, and c are the constants and  

We have a quadratic expression:

[tex]\rm f(x)=-2x^2+28x+20[/tex]

Convert it to perfect square by perfect square trinomial:

[tex]\rm f(x)=-2(x^2+14x)+20[/tex]  

[tex]\rm f(x)=-2(x^2+14x+49-49)+20[/tex]   (adding and subtracting by 49)

[tex]\rm f(x)=-2(x-7)^2+2(49)+20[/tex]

[tex]\rm f(x)=-2(x-7)^2+118[/tex]

Here [tex]\rm (x-7)^2[/tex] is the positive term and -2 is the negative term so in order to get the highest weekly profit it should be zero, so

[tex]\rm -2(x-7)^2=0[/tex]

x = $7

Thus, the given expression is equivalent to [tex]\rm -2(x-7)^2+118[/tex]  and the price is $7.

Learn more about quadratic expression here:

brainly.com/question/2263981

Answer:

First option A.  −2(x − 7)^2 + 118; x = $7

Step-by-step explanation:

Took the test and it's correct, trust me :)

Answer: 6.5 is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Trapezoid

Explanation:

A trapezoid does not have two pairs of parallel sides.

Answer: D. Trapezoid

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

96.7%

Step-by-step explanation:

87/90 = 0.96666666

To make this number a percentage, we move the decimal point two places to the right. Her grade would be 96.6666 percent, which rounds up to 96.7%

Answer:

96.7%

Step-by-step explanation:

87÷90×100

Answer:

14visists

Step-by-step explanation:

206 points= 45points + 11.5points(number of visits)

let number of visits=x

206points-45points=11.5x

161=11.5x

x=161/11.5

x=14 visits

The shape is not normal since the sample size (6) is less than 30.

The mean and standard deviation of the sample distribution is 39, and 0.82 repectively

The normal distribution is a distribution that is symmetric about the mean and has a bell shaped curve.

Given that

n = 6, mean = 39 and standard deviation o = 2.

Hence:

The shape is not normal since the sample size (6) is less than 30.

The mean of the sample distribution = 39, the standard deviation of the sample distribution = 2/√6 = 0.82

Find out more on normal distribution at: https://brainly.com/question/4079902

Step-by-step explanation:

I never learned this (for good reasons, I say). for me this is the strangest thing in math. math is precise. we are not guessing around when we can actually calculate things.

this is definitely ok, when just trying to decide, if one fraction is larger than the other, but to use that for an actual operation among fractions, is the biggest nonsense I have ever seen in math lessons (and not simpler than doing the precise calculation). again, math is a precise thing. the only valid level of imprecise answers is rounding, but only for the end result, not for intermediate results, because the rounding errors are rarely compensating for each other, they mostly pile up making the end result even less precise.

enough with the venting ...

benchmark fractions are the simple fractions (and their multiples)

1 (=1/1), 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/6

and then in steps of 2 :

1/8, 1/10, 1/12, ...

we try to find the closest simple fractions to our actual fractions and use them to estimate the actual result.

the simplest (but also normally the least precise) benchmark approach is using 1/2 as benchmark unit and 0, 1/2, 1 as benchmarks.

so, is 10/12 closest to 0, to 1/2 or to 1 ?

we know that 0 in 12ths would be 0/12, 1/2 would be 6/12, and 1 would be 12/12.

so, out of these 3 values 10/12 is closest to 12/12 (=1), so that is what you are choosing as representation.

is 3/8 closest to 0, 1/2 or to 1 ?

we would have 0/8, 4/8, 8/8.

and 3/8 is closest to 4/8 (= 1/2), and that is what we are choosing here as representation.

and the estimated result of 10/12 - 3/8 = 1 - 1/2 = 1/2 or 4/8 or 6/12.

let's pick 1/4 as benchmark unit.

so, are the numbers closest to

0, 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 or 1 (4/4) ?

for 10/12 we get then

0/12, 3/12, 6/12, 9/12, 12/12

and 10/12 is closest to 9/12 (3/4), which we pick as representation.

for 3/8 we get

0/8, 2/8, 4/8, 6/8, 8/8

if equidistant, we have to round up, so, we get 4/8 (2/4), which we pick as representation.

and the estimated calculation is

10/12 - 3/8 = 3/4 - 2/4 = 1/4

which is really horrible ...

2 and 4 are factors of 12 and 8. all smaller benchmark fractions (<1/4; so, e.g. 1/5, 1/6, 1/8. ...) are not meeting that criteria, making the benchmark finding much harder. so, I would not try that.

the real result is

the LCM of 12 and 8 is 24 (2×12 and 3×8).

so, we have

20/24 - 9/24 = 11/24 (almost 1/2).

so, actually, the benchmark unit of 1/2 is giving the best result here.

but to just do the exercise of benchmark units that are not factors of both denominators, let's pick 1/6

so, are the numbers closest to

0, 1/6, 2/6, 3/6, 4/6, 5/6 or 1 (6/6) ?

for 10/12 we get (all nicely)

0/12, 2/12, 4/12, 6/12, 8/12, 10/12, 12/12

so, 10/12 is closest to 10/12 (of course) = 5/6, which we pick as representation.

for 3/8 we get (ugh, we have to go for 24ths here too as 4×6 and 3×8)

0/24, 4/24, 8/24, 12/24, 16/24, 20/24. 24/24

3/8 = 9/24

so, the closest number to 9/24 is 8/24 (= 2/6), which we pick as representation.

and the estimated calculation is

10/12 - 3/8 = 5/6 - 2/6 = 3/6 = 1/2

did I say already that I don't like this ? that I don't see the advantage to the actual calculation ?

so, just in case : I don't like this (ugh) !