Answer:
Here ya go hope this works for u ;)
Forensic scientists use analytical and scientific techniques to examine evidence from crimes and prepare legal statements that summarise the results for court cases. Forensic science is the application of science to the law by gathering and examining evidence to be used in a legal case.
During the forensic science process, forensic equipment is used to process samples and evidence to solve crimes. ... Specifically, sciences such as biology, chemistry and mathematics are combined with various technologies to process evidence.
Answer:
Forensic science R&D in the 1980s laid the groundwork for advances in the 1990s and early 2000s that had a profound impact on crime laboratories. Although the scientific advances, particularly the growth of DNA testing, provided more effective tools for analyzing evidence and identifying perpetrators, they also led to a dramatic increase in the demand for lab services. By the late 1990s and through the 2000s, demand outstripped the ability of the labs to respond quickly and efficiently. Today, scientists and technicians at forensic labs are under relentless pressure to produce results faster and at lower cost. NIJ employs a two-pronged approach to supporting forensic labs:
• In the short term, NIJ awards grants to labs that cover the increasing costs of processing cases, assist in DNA backlog reduction and support ongoing efforts to adopt more advanced instrumentation and analytical methods.
• In the long term, NIJ awards grants to scientists to conduct research, both basic and applied, that can lead to methods, techniques and technology that will advance forensic science and, ultimately, public safety and justice.
Innovation is an essential way to assist crime labs. For example, high-tech robotic workstations can now process large numbers of DNA samples simultaneously, allowing crime labs to work more efficiently. NIJ-supported research helped in the development of fully automated systems that amplify DNA from small samples to determine a person’s genetic profile. The workstations not only make labs more efficient but also lower the cost of DNA processing.
NIJ is also funding several projects that seek to apply more sophisticated methods to detect and analyze evidence. Examining evidence for trace amounts of blood or other biological material is time consuming for law enforcement and crime lab personnel, and it requires techniques that can compromise or destroy evidence. One NIJ-funded project involves developing a camera with multispectral and fluorescence imaging capabilities to detect and identify fingerprints, body fluids, stains and other residues at crime scenes. Such imaging technology would make it easier for investigators to find and process evidence while minimizing evidence contamination.
Researchers working on another NIJ-supported project are developing methods that will allow investigators to identify the body fluids in a stain without destroying any of the stained material. Researchers are also exploring how to use one sample to determine multiple pieces of information, such as body fluid type and genetic information associated with identity.
Explanation:
Explain what a budget is, and outline the main features of a budget.
Answer:
A budget is a financial document or an action plan which is prepared and used to project future income and expenses. It outlines an organisation's financial and operational goals. It can also include non- monetary information with the monetary information.
Answer:
A Budget is a plan expressed in quantitative usually monetary terms, covering a specified period of time, usually one year. Many companies refer to their annual budget as a profit plan since it shows the planned activities that the company expects to undertake in its responsibility centers in order to obtain its profit goals.
Explanation:
This branch has the power to impeach and override vetoes.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answer:
Legislative Branch
Explanation:
What reasons did the president give for justifying his claim of executive privilege?
Answer:
To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.
Explanation:
On page 406 of the text, read the case entitled Coker v. Pershad. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey reasons that AAA had no control over the independent contractor's work and thus Pershad was an employee of Five Star, but Five Star (and by extension, Pershad) were independent contractors to AAA. This type of arrangement is not uncommon. Neither are situations where trucking companies (among others) employ individuals who are designated as independent contractors but are trained by the company and have a manual of regulations provided to them which, in essence, controls where they drive, how they drive, how long are the drivers' work breaks, and who can ride in the cab of the truck. Additionally, drivers often wear a company uniform. The artifice of calling someone an independent contractor when the driver actually is not, is no more than an effort to avoid liability for the person's actions on the job and certain regulatory (unemployment insurance; workers compensation, etc.) and tax considerations. Consequently, the situations must be carefully examined on a case-by-case basis to discern the actual status of the individual. Do you agree with the courts reasoning? Why?
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question.
Explanation:
Yeah, We agree with the North Carolina Court the decision that 5 Stars was an independent consultant. AAA does hire and fir five Stars staff, who may not evaluate all staff to see if their company is fit. they will not. AAA employed 5 Star in the name of the rental agency and was not responsible for its and other businesses. It is an employer, that is a consultant regardless of who determines to work. Decided to hire that work or even the independent contractor the company that had hired an independent contractor. We employ people as they already have the training to do a work, which the organization has completed, this is like recruiting an employment agency. I don't think companies avoid liability.
What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless he has been informed of his right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything he says will be held against him in a court of law.
Read the attached opinion in Burnatoski v Butler Ambulance Service Co - Agency.pdf. One of the issues here was whether or not the city was legally responsible for the acts of a driver working for a separate ambulance company in which the city had only assisted the ambulance company to obtain a federal grant to help pay for the ambulance. Under the Pennsylvania Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, a municipality is immune from claims such as this, unless its employee is the operator of the vehicle. The proceedings indicated that the driver was not a city employee, after which the municipality was dismissed, but the ambulance company and driver remained as defendants. Did the City control or direct the activities of the driver to the extent that the City should be liable for the manner in which he operated the vehicle at the time of the accident? Please advocate for the plaintiff or the defendant and provide the basis for your position.
Answer:
cb
Explanation:
The plaintiff's argument may be that the City should be liable for the driver's actions because the City played a role in helping the ambulance company obtain a federal grant to pay for the ambulance.
Who is an advocate?In law, an advocate is a person who is professionally qualified to plead another's cause in a court of law.
The plaintiff may argue that the City should be held liable for the driver's actions because the City assisted the ambulance company in obtaining a federal grant to pay for the ambulance.
Furthermore, the plaintiff could argue that the City exercised some level of control or direction over the driver's actions while operating the ambulance.
Even though the driver was not technically a City employee, the plaintiff could argue that the City had some input or influence over the ambulance company's operations.
The defendant's argument, on the other hand, could be that the City had no control or direction over the driver's actions and thus should not be held liable for the accident.
The defendant could claim that the City's role was limited to assisting the ambulance company in obtaining the grant and that the City had no say in how the ambulance company operated.
The defendant may also claim that the driver was not a City employee and that the City had no direct influence over his actions.
Thus, the court must weigh the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to determine whether or not the City is liable for the driver's actions.
For more details regarding advocacy, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31316893
#SPJ2
To address the widespread and growing concern of contaminated food causing serious injury and death to individuals throughout the United States, Congress passed a law stating that anyone intentionally distributing contaminated food is subject to criminal prosecution, civil fines, or both.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Police officer placing sign outside a rail station that says 'Waiting Room for White Only.'
© 2012 The Associated Press
This police office is placing a sign outside a rail station. He is enforcing the ruling in
D.C. v. Heller
Plessy v. Ferguson
Marbury v. Madison
Brown v. Board of Education
Answer:
The answer would be "B" or Plessy V. Ferguson
Answer:
the answer is B, Plessy v. Ferguson.
Explanation:
Have a great day!! Hope this helps!!
If your license is a must wear a correct of glass lenses you
Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.
Explanation:
1. Police Officer Rector observed an automobile going the wrong direction on a one-way street. When the officer tried to stop the automobile, the driver fled, resulting in a high-speed chase. The chase ended when the driver’s car crashed into a telephone pole. Concerned that the car might ignite from a gas leak, the officer pulled the unconscious woman from the car. As he was grabbing the woman from the car, he saw he a knife covered in blood on the front seat. After pulling the woman to safety the officer went back to the vehicle and recovered the knife. It was later discovered that the knife was used in a murder of the woman’s husband. Did Officer Rector legally find the knife? Explain.
