Answer:
Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. ... After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court
What is difference between warrant of arrest and warrantless arrest?
Answer:
the difference is a warrant arrest is when law enforcement plans your arrest and a warrantless arrest is when it just happens like getting a traffic stop and them finding unexpected drugs.
Explanation:
There are many differences between a warrant arrest and the non-warrant arrest. The major difference between both the arrests is that while arresting a person with a warrant the law authorities were already prepared to arrest that with documents and permission of the court.
However, in a non-warrant arrest, the arrest is made without any preparation either for petty crimes or for such crimes which are dangerous for society but took place suddenly without the notice of the law authorities.
What is an arrest?The Arrest is made by the law authorities in order to regulate the law and order in the regions and also to protect the civilians from the crimes which can take place by the criminals.
The act of arrest doesn't declare a person a criminal but it begins the process of reaching the criminal by arresting the accused person.
Learn more about “arrest” here:
https://brainly.com/question/14286068
#SPJ2
An employees personal email composed and sent at work is protected by the right of privacy true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Employees' right to privacy in the workplace encompass an employee's personal information and activities at work. ( That include private emails)
Encoding and Decoding are in a constant cycle in a good speech, this means that the speaker is sending a message and the audience is receiving it and sending feedback in return.
True or False
The Crimes that are not reported to police are called the....
Answer:
Dark Figure of crime.
Explanation:
The dark (or hidden) figure of crime is a term employed by criminologists and sociologists to describe the amount of unreported or undiscovered crime.
Why do the people do what they do in verse 31?
Debates must utilize all three purposes for public speaking: to inform, to entertain, and to persuade.
True or False
Answer: true
Explanation: good luck
Why has probation become so important to the operation of law enforcement?
It is the most commonly applied sanction.
It is the most underused sanction.
It has become a sadly ineffective sanction.
It is the sanction preferred by judges.
Answer: A. It's the most conmanly applied sanction
Explanation:
"Probation plays an extremely important role in the operation of the law enforcement and corrections systems in the United States. Probation is currently the most commonly applied correctional sanction," - from the article the very first paragraph in the page off Edge.
As a future student, why we need so study special crime investigation?
in john 10 who are the sheep
Answer:
In this case, He contrasts His spiritual leadership with that of false teachers, including the hypocritical religious critics of His own era. Jesus previously identified Himself as "the Good Shepherd," saying that He was willing to die for the sake of His flock. This is a very different approach from a typical "hired" shepherd, who is inclined to run when there is danger. Spiritually, Jesus is the ultimate example of a shepherd willing to sacrifice Himself for the safety and health of His flock.
In the prior verse, Jesus echoed an important point made in His first analogy (John 10:1–6). There He referred to the way sheep instinctively learn to recognize the voice of their own shepherd. This reflects the close, knowing, personal relationship a "good shepherd" has with the sheep. Here, Jesus compares that closeness and intimacy with the relationship between God the Son and God the Father. This echoes other statements in the New Testament which imply that salvation through Jesus Christ brings us into an intimate family relationship with God (1 John 3:1; Romans 8:16–17).
PLEASE HELP !!! With any question !!!
1: what evidence let the police to arrest Clarence Gideon ?
2: at the beginning of the trial why did Gideon not have a lawyer ?
3: how did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
4: how did Gideon‘s case get to the Supreme Court ?
5: why did the Supreme Court a sept Gideon‘s case ?
6: what was the supreme court ruling and Gideons?
7: what was the vote on the ruling
8: what ultimately happened to Clarence earl Garden?
Answer:
1.Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested after a nearby resident told police he had see Gideon walking away from the pool hall about 5:30 AM. When police arrested Mr. Gideon, he had a pint of wine and a pocketful of change.
Explanation:
8.
What was the vote on the ruling?
A casting vote is a vote that someone may exercise to resolve a deadlock. A casting vote is typically by the presiding officer of a council, legislative body, committee, etc., and may only be exercised to break a deadlock.
Examples of officers who hold casting votes are the Speaker of the British House of Commons and the President of the United States Senate (an ex-officio role of the Vice President of the United States).
In some legislatures, a casting vote may be exercised however the presiding officer wishes. An example is the Vice President of the United States, who may exercise his casting vote in the Senate according to his party affiliation or according to his own personal beliefs; by virtue of the Vice President's casting vote, when the Senate as elected is equally divided between two parties, the Vice President's party is able to serve as the official majority party in the Senate.
In some other legislatures, by contrast, a casting vote can only be exercised according to strict rules or conventions. For example, the Speaker of the British House of Commons (and analogous positions in most Westminster Parliaments) is expected by constitutional convention to follow Speaker Denison's rule, i.e. to vote to allow further discussion, if this is possible, and otherwise to vote in favour of the status quo.
In the United States, the concept of a casting vote is not used in Robert's Rules of Order.
You are interviewed by a prospective employer concerning a job that you have coveted for several years. After protracted (lengthy) negotiations, you are presented with a pre-printed form contract that contains the terms of your employment agreement.
In the body of the agreement, it states, “This document contains the full and complete understanding and agreement by and between the parties. No other representations or promises have been made. Both parties understand that this contract is a wholly integrated agreement.” This language appeared somewhere in the middle of the 4 page pre-printed form.
Just prior to signing the agreement, the employer made several promises to you, including but not limited to the following:
You will receive a year-end bonus each and every year that will be based on your performance
Your health insurance will be paid by the company after you complete your probationary period of six months
You will be reimbursed for auto expenses that you incur while using your car for business purposes.
The employer refused to honor ANY of the above oral promises and also fired you without cause. You sue the employer and attempt to introduce evidence of the oral promises. Your employer objects.
What are the legal arguments favoring your employer that if accepted by the court, would prevent you from introducing evidence of the promises?
What are the legal arguments that you would make to convince the court to allow you to introduce the oral promises?
Answer:
The legal argument favoring the employer it is his decision to employ u if he wants.
The legal that you would make to convince the court is the agreement paper u bring it to the court has sign of evidence of the promises or agreement. it might be able to covince them to believe u.
Plz don't report me
7. What was the Supreme Court ruling in Gideon?
Answer:
In 1963, The supreme court unanimously in favor of the Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts
The Federalist 10
Brutus 1
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution
In your essay, you must:
✓ Respond to the prompt with a defensible claim or thesis that establishes a line of reasoning.
✓ Support your claim with specific and relevant evidence.
✓ Use one piece of evidence from one of foundational documents listed above.
Answer:78
Explanation:78
When acceleration is positive does that mean it is always increasing in speed?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
it's more complicated than that.
acceleration can be positive but be slowing down in speed at the same time.
how you can acquire the professional standards for teacher?
Explanation:
ewan ko basta ang alam ko wala kang jowa
here were we stand we shall have two winners of the daily give away so play your cards right my friends for u shall never see this today again
oh and please give me all of the food in ur fridge right now
ayoooooooo cool cool
How is formal authority distinguished and give examples of each characteristic from the SAA case
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached and you did not include the SSA case, we can only comment on formal authority.
When we use the term formal authority, we mean that is the kind of power that a company gives to a leader in a corporation. For example, when a new manager is hired by a company, he is granted the power to lead the company or any of its departments. At this moment, the manager has the power and influence over its employees.
However, there is another concept called informal authority, that does not come from the owners of the company or the high hierarchy. It comes from your employees, the people. It is the moment when people trust who you are and follow you for what you have shown, not for your position in the company.
That is why it is so important to have both kinds of authority because it is the best way to lead people under difficult circumstances.
list three minerals that are used around your house
Answer:
Quartz in mirrors
Graphite in pencil leads
Steel from knobs and hinges
Explanation:
What was the original purpose of profiling?
Informal criminal profiling has a long history. It was used as early as the 1880s, when two physicians, George Phillips and Thomas Bond, used crime scene clues to make predictions about British serial murderer Jack the Ripper's personality.
John Douglas in the year 1970 started the original profiling purpose for the FBI. Hence, the above statement is correct.
What is the Original Profiling Purpose?The original profiling purpose was John Douglas's watershed theory about criminalizing the fact and the idea regarding FBI promotions. The FBI used his technique to capture the criminals. The main purpose is the way in which criminal psychology has been taken into consideration.
The Original Profiling Purpose was described as the result of the primary purpose of the FBI's motive for the criminal activity.
Learn more about the Original Profiling Purpose here:
https://brainly.com/question/14343968
#SPJ2
Regarding age and gender related to violent crime victimization, choose the most accurate statement:
* a. Young males are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* b. Young females are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* c. Older males are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
* d. Older females are more likely to be a victim of violent crime.
in trials that receive a lot of media attention the judge my sequester ,the jury to prevent them from having access to outside influences like television or the Internet do you think this is fair ? why or why not?
Answer:
It is necessary to sequester the jury in order to avoid accidental or deliberate tainting by outside forces. I.E., The media or social media. The reason this can be a detriment is because you're basing your judgment with bias. Therefore, the trial is not impartial.
Explanation:
Judges have done this in high profile cases. The jury is more selective and more discreet.
4. How did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
Answer:
Florida law only permitted counsel of poor defendants charged with capital offenses. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition was denied.
Explanation:
Gideon v. Wainright
Supreme Court ruled that the 6th amendment's guarantee of counsel corresponds with the 14th amendment (made obligatory) by the states. In other words, the 6th amendment guarantees the defendant the right to the assistance of counsel in ALL criminal proceedings. Finally, the states had to provide counsel.
The President has the power to grant complete legal forgiveness for a crime that was committed through his power to grant
a pardon
a commutation
an executive agreement
amnesty
Answer:
The answer to the question is a pardon
Answer:
amnesty
Explanation:
An amnesty is an act of the sovereign power granting oblivion, or a general pardon, for a past offense, as to subjects concerned in an insurrection.
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
Identify the woman in the picture.
6. Why did the Supreme Court accept Gideon's Case?
The Court held that the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Drag each tile to the correct box.
what is the Sequence in forensic history events in chronological order.
Answer:
We need to see the tiles
Explanation:
If not we dont know what it looks like or how to help you
Answer:
pic
Explanation:
i cant answer without a pic
when may a minor legally purchase alcohol in texas
Answer:
Texas alcohol laws permit adults aged 18 or older to tend bar. They may also serve alcohol in a venue for drinking on-site. Those 16 or older may sell beer and wine in stores selling it for consumption elsewhere. They must be age 21 to sell spirits (liquor) in such businesses.
Explanation:
im not sure a minor can. pretty sure its illegal.
What decides if a ruling is the law of the land?
Answer:
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws
Explanation:
Answer:The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.
